PhyloTreePruner: A Phylogenetic Tree-Based Approach for selection of Orthologous sequences for phylogenomics
Open accessAbstract
Molecular phylogenetics relies on accurate identification of orthologous sequences among the taxa of interest. Most orthology inference programs available for use in phylogenomics rely on small sets of pre-defined orthologs from model organisms or phenetic approaches such as all-versus-all sequence comparisons followed by Markov graph-based clustering. Such approaches have high sensitivity but may erroneously include paralogous sequences. We developed PhyloTreePruner, a software utility that uses a phylogenetic approach to refine orthology inferences made using phenetic methods. PhyloTreePruner checks single-gene trees for evidence of paralogy and generates a new alignment for each group containing only sequences inferred to be orthologs. Importantly, PhyloTreePruner takes into account support values on the tree and avoids unnecessarily deleting sequences in cases where a weakly supported tree topology incorrectly indicates paralogy. A test of PhyloTreePruner on a dataset generated from 11 completely sequenced arthropod genomes identified 2,027 orthologous groups sampled for all taxa. Phylogenetic analysis of the concatenated supermatrix yielded a generally well-supported topology that was consistent with the current understanding of arthropod phylogeny. PhyloTreePruner is freely available from http://sourceforge.net/projects/phylotreepruner /.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
WEA15 and WEA17 were curated to control for paralogs using tree-based approaches.
“WEA15 and WEA17 were curated to control for paralogs using tree-based approaches 8 .”
From Available data do not rule out Ctenophora as the sister group to all other Metazoa (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 35 · Cited by 166
- Authors
- Kocot, K. M., Citarella, M. R., Moroz, L. L., & Halanych, K. M.
- Affiliations
- Auburn University (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kocot, Kevin M.
- Venue
- Evolutionary Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 429-35
- ISSN
- 1176-9343 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3825643
- OpenAlex
- W2038740993
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Evolutionary Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0821622, 0843473, 1146575, 1036537, 1210518)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Brain Research Foundation
- McKnight Foundation
- Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Research Foundation
- Auburn University
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH097062)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA030118)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM097502)
- Division of Integrative Organismal Systems (IOS-1146575)
- Division of Environmental Biology (DEB‐1036537)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
- Keywords
- orthology inference, phylogenetic tree, phylogenomics, arthropod phylogeny, orthogroups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review