Cited by 79Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food

Intake, digestibility and aerobic stability of barley silage inoculated with mixtures of Lactobacillus plantarum and Enterococcus faecium

Open access
McAllister, T. A., Selinger, L. B., McMahon, L. R., Bae, H. D., Lysyk, T. J., Oosting, S. J., Cheng, K.-J.·1995·Canadian Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

The effect of ensiling barley treated with two bacterial inoculants containing mixtures of Lactobacillus plantarum and Enterococcus faecium (1.0 × 105 cfu g−1 as fed silage) on the nutritional value and aerobic stability of barley silage was examined. Inoculants differed in the strains they contained and were originally selected by Pioneer Hi-Bred International for use with corn or alfalfa silage, SILA-BAC® (1174), or with grass silage (X2637). Concentrations of water-soluble carbohydrates were higher (P < 0.05) in inoculated than in control silages. Although inoculants appeared to increase the numbers of lactic acid producing bacteria (LAB) at ensiling, post-ensiling numbers (cfu g−1) of yeasts and molds were lower (P < 0.05) in inoculated than in control silages. Lactic acid concentrations and pH were similar among the silages and variations m the growth of yeast and mold populations could not be explained by differences in the production of volatile fatty acids (VFA) among silages. Inoculation of barley silage with either inoculant increased (P < 0.01) the average daily gain of lambs. A digestibility experiment with 12 growing ram lambs showed that inoculants did not alter (P > 0.05) DM intake, feed efficiency or the digestion of DM, organic matter, acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF). Nitrogen intake and retention were greater (P < 0.05) in lambs fed silage inoculated with 1174 as compared with control silage. Yeast populations were increased (P < 0.05) in control and 1174 after 2 d of exposure to air but it required 13 d for a similar yeast population to be established in X2637 silage. Increases in the mold populations within the silages were noted after 2, 5 and 13 d of exposure to air for control, 1174 and X2637, respectively. The temperature of control silage increased (P < 0.05) 2 d after exposure to air, whereas increases in temperature were delayed for 4 d in 1174 and 8 d in X2637. Temperatures rose as high as 30 °C in control silage, but did not exceed 24 °C in inoculated silages during the 13 d period. Key words: Barley silage, inoculant, digestion, aerobic stability, sheep, gain

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4141/cjas95-062

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 79

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Henderson, A. R., Anderson, D. II. and Phillips' P' 1984' Pages 4142 in F. J. Gordon and E. F. Unsworth eds. Seventh Silage Conference, Sumrnary of Papers. Queen's University, Belfast'
  2. Muck, R. E. and Bolsen, K. K. 1991. Silage preservation and silage additive products. Pages 105-126 in K. K' Bolsen, J' E' Baylor, and M. E. McCullough, eds. Baylora field guide for hay and silage management in North America, Natl' Feed Ingred Assoc., Des Moines, IA.
  3. Seale, D. R. and Henderson, A. R. 1984. Effect of inocularion with homofermentative and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation. Pages 5-6 in F. J. Gordon and E. F. Unsworth, eds. Seventh Silage Conference, Summary of papers. Queen's University, Belfast.

Authors
McAllister, T. A., Selinger, L. B., McMahon, L. R., Bae, H. D., Lysyk, T. J., Oosting, S. J., & Cheng, K.-J.
Affiliations
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Published
1995-09-01
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
425-432
ISSN
  • 0008-3984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1918-1825
OpenAlex
W2080653434
Cited by
79
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Canadian Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
DuPont Pioneer
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Keywords
barley silage, silage inoculants, Lactobacillus plantarum, Enterococcus faecium, aerobic stability, silage fermentation, lactic acid bacteria, yeast and mold growth, volatile fatty acids, silage temperature, lambs, feed intake, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen retention, water-soluble carbohydrates, silage quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review