The DOI matches its Crossref record.
GLUCOSINOLATE PROFILES IN THE SEED, ROOT AND LEAF TISSUE OF CABBAGE, MUSTARD, RAPESEED, RADISH AND SWEDE
Abstract
Due to the limitations of previous methods for glucosinolate analysis, only fragmentary information has been available on glucosinolate profiles in plant tissues. Using a newly developed high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) procedure for the separation of desulphoglucosinolates formed by enzymic desulphation of endogenous glucosinolates, the glucosinolate contents in the seed, root and leaf of five cruciferous plants (cabbage, mustard, radish, rapeseed and swede) have been investigated. Identities of peaks in the HPLC chromatograms were confirmed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Major differences between the seed, leaf and root profiles in the same plant were obtained for all five species investigated. Particular attention was directed to the indole glucosinolates, including the recently discovered compounds, 4-hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl glucosinolate and 4-methoxy-3-indolymethyl glucosinolate, for which analytical methods have been previously lacking. These indole glucosinolates were found to have defined distribution patterns: 4-methoxyl-3-indolymethyl glucosinolate and 1-methoxy-3-indolylmethyl glucosinolate were absent in seed material whereas 4-hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl glucosinolate was found in highest concentrations in this tissue. 3-Indolylmethyl glucosinolate was found in low levels in seed but was the dominant indole glucosinolate in the leaf. The possible implications of these findings are discussed. Keywords: Indole glucosinolates, Brassica napus, B. juncea, B. oleracea, B. napobrassica, Raphanus sativus, Cruciferae
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Secondary metabolites in plant defence mechanisms
BENNETT, R. N., & WALLSGROVE, R. M. (1994) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb02968.x · Cited by 1,654
Control of Soil-Borne Plant Pests Using Glucosinolate-Containing Plants
Brown, P. D., & Morra, M. J. (1997) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60664-1 · Cited by 615
The effect of cooking on the phytochemical content of vegetables
Palermo, M., Pellegrini, N., & Fogliano, V. (2014) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.6478 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- SANG, J. P., MINCHINTON, I. R., JOHNSTONE, P. K., & TRUSCOTT, R. J. W.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Plant Science
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1984-01-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-93
- ISSN
- 0008-4220 (ISSN-L)
- 1918-1833
- OpenAlex
- W2086545969
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GLUCOSINOLATE PROFILES IN THE SEED, ROOT AND LEAF TISSUE OF CABBAGE, MUSTARD, RAPESEED, RADISH AND SWEDE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4141/cjps84-011
- The paper
- SANG, J. P., MINCHINTON, I. R., JOHNSTONE, P. K., & TRUSCOTT, R. J. W. (1984). GLUCOSINOLATE PROFILES IN THE SEED, ROOT AND LEAF TISSUE OF CABBAGE, MUSTARD, RAPESEED, RADISH AND SWEDE. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps84-011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.