Nitrogen availability from peat amendments used in boreal oil sands reclamation
Abstract
Following surface mining, peat is typically used as an organic amendment to cap reconstructed soils in the Athabasca oil sands region of Alberta. Yet, very little is known about its ability to provide available nitrogen (N) in these soils. Hence, the overall objective of this study was to measure soil nitrogen (N) availability throughout the year in five peat amendments. Specific objectives were: (1) to examine seasonal variability in soil labile N pool sizes (nitrate, ammonium, dissolved organic N, and microbial biomass N), and (2) to determine in situ net nitrification, ammonification, and mineralization rates using the resin-core technique. Results from this field incubation method indicated a strong seasonal variability in net mineralization rates, with maximum positive values in the fall, and low or negative rates in winter. Net ammonification rates, which were significantly correlated to soil moisture content, were significantly smaller and showed smaller seasonal fluctuations and fewer differences among peat materials than net nitrification rates. Furthermore, the contribution of net nitrification to total net mineralization rates was characteristically higher than what is typically observed in undisturbed boreal forest soils. Taken together, results indicate that net nitrification processes may control nitrogen availability in these reclaimed soils.Key words: Soil nitrogen, soil reclamation, nitrification, mineralization, boreal soils
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Peat is naturally abundant in the oil sands mining footprint around Fort McMurray, Alberta, and is currently used as the main organic amendment in reclamation.
“Peat is naturally abundant in the oil sands mining footprint around Fort McMurray, Alberta, and is currently used as the main organic amendment in reclamation (Hemstock et al. 2010) as transportation of other amendments to the region is considered cost prohibitive.”
From The role of organic amendments in soil reclamation: A review (2012) · cites this paper as Hemstock et al. 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 36
- Authors
- Hemstock, S. S., Quideau, S. A., & Chanasyk, D. S.
- ORCID
- Quideau, S A
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Soil Science
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2010-02-01
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 165-175
- ISSN
- 0008-4271 (ISSN-L)
- 1918-1841
- OpenAlex
- W2090896185
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Soil Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Government of Alberta
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
- Keywords
- nitrogen availability, peat amendment, oil sands reclamation, boreal forest soils, nitrification, mineralization, ammonification, seasonal variation, soil moisture, microbial biomass nitrogen, dissolved organic nitrogen, nitrate, ammonium, Athabasca oil sands
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review