Cited by 36Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsPeatlands and Wetlands EcologySoil and Unsaturated Flow

Nitrogen availability from peat amendments used in boreal oil sands reclamation

Hemstock, S S, Quideau, S A, Chanasyk, D S·2010·Canadian Journal of Soil Science

Abstract

Following surface mining, peat is typically used as an organic amendment to cap reconstructed soils in the Athabasca oil sands region of Alberta. Yet, very little is known about its ability to provide available nitrogen (N) in these soils. Hence, the overall objective of this study was to measure soil nitrogen (N) availability throughout the year in five peat amendments. Specific objectives were: (1) to examine seasonal variability in soil labile N pool sizes (nitrate, ammonium, dissolved organic N, and microbial biomass N), and (2) to determine in situ net nitrification, ammonification, and mineralization rates using the resin-core technique. Results from this field incubation method indicated a strong seasonal variability in net mineralization rates, with maximum positive values in the fall, and low or negative rates in winter. Net ammonification rates, which were significantly correlated to soil moisture content, were significantly smaller and showed smaller seasonal fluctuations and fewer differences among peat materials than net nitrification rates. Furthermore, the contribution of net nitrification to total net mineralization rates was characteristically higher than what is typically observed in undisturbed boreal forest soils. Taken together, results indicate that net nitrification processes may control nitrogen availability in these reclaimed soils.Key words: Soil nitrogen, soil reclamation, nitrification, mineralization, boreal soils

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4141/cjss09021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peat is naturally abundant in the oil sands mining footprint around Fort McMurray, Alberta, and is currently used as the main organic amendment in reclamation.

    “Peat is naturally abundant in the oil sands mining footprint around Fort McMurray, Alberta, and is currently used as the main organic amendment in reclamation (Hemstock et al. 2010) as transportation of other amendments to the region is considered cost prohibitive.”

    From The role of organic amendments in soil reclamation: A review (2012) · cites this paper as Hemstock et al. 2010

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 36

Authors
Hemstock, S. S., Quideau, S. A., & Chanasyk, D. S.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Soil Science
Published
2010-02-01
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
165-175
ISSN
  • 0008-4271 (ISSN-L)
  • 1918-1841
OpenAlex
W2090896185
Cited by
36
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Soil Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Government of Alberta
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Keywords
nitrogen availability, peat amendment, oil sands reclamation, boreal forest soils, nitrification, mineralization, ammonification, seasonal variation, soil moisture, microbial biomass nitrogen, dissolved organic nitrogen, nitrate, ammonium, Athabasca oil sands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review