The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals
Abstract
In Mediterranean regions, plant breeding programs are being conducted to select genotypes having high and stable yields. Screening techniques that are able to identify desirable genotypes based on the evaluation of physiological traits related to stress tolerance could be useful, particularly if they are rapid, simple and inexpensive. The objectives of this study were: i) to evaluate the validity of four laboratory screening tests to discriminate among bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars differing in adaptation to the Mediterranean climate; ii) to evaluate the repeatability of determinations performed on cultivars grown in different locations and years, and iii) to evaluate relationships among the tests and yield performance under stress. The tests were: cellular membrane stability after heat (CMS-HS) and drought stress (CMS-DS), tolerance to leaf water loss (LWL), and translocation capacity after the chemical desiccation (CD) of the photosynthetic apparatus. The CMS-HS and CMS-DS tests revealed genetic variability in all the three species. The LWL test did not differentiate genotypes at some sites. Genetic differences for grain yield, kernel weight and harvest index after chemical desiccation were evident for wheat genotypes but the test did not differentiate barley genotypes. The test performed under laboratory controlled conditions (CMS-HS, CMS-DS and LWL) was less affected by environment compared with the test based on the evaluation of the translocation capacity after chemical desiccation carried out in the field. We concluded that, when good standardization of procedures are obtained, the tests investigated can be regarded as possible tools in breeding programs for tolerance to heat and drought stress. Key words: Wheat, barley, drought screening
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant Breeding for Stress Environments
Blum, A. (2018) · doi:10.1201/9781351075718 · Cited by 1,309
Cited by
Plaut, Z., Butow, B. J., Blumenthal, C. S., & Wrigley, C. W. (2004) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2003.08.005 · Cited by 393
Metadata
- Authors
- Gavuzzi, P., Rizza, F., Palumbo, M., Campanile, R. G., Ricciardi, G. L., & Borghi, B.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Plant Science
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 523-531
- ISSN
- 0008-4220 (ISSN-L)
- 1918-1833
- OpenAlex
- W2017218741
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4141/p96-130
- The paper
- Gavuzzi, P., Rizza, F., Palumbo, M., Campanile, R. G., Ricciardi, G. L., & Borghi, B. (1997). Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.4141/p96-130
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.