Cited by 135Biofuel production and bioconversionCatalysis for Biomass ConversionThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

Understanding the impact of ionic liquid pretreatment on eucalyptus

Çetinkol, Özgül Persil, Dibble, Dean C, Cheng, Gang, Kent, Michael S, Knierim, Bernhard, Auer, Manfred, Wemmer, David E, Pelton, Jeffrey G +4 more·2010·Biofuels

Abstract

Background: The development of cost-competitive biofuels necessitates the realization of advanced biomass pretreatment technologies. Ionic liquids provide a basis for one of the most promising pretreatment technologies and are known to allow effective processing of cellulose and some biomass species. Results & discussion: Here, we demonstrate that the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methyl imidazolium acetate, [C2mim][OAc], induces structural changes at the molecular level in the cell wall of Eucalyptus globulus. Deacetylation of xylan, acetylation of the lignin units, selective removal of guaiacyl units (increasing the syringyl:guaiacyl ratio) and decreased β-ether content were the most prominent changes observed. Scanning electron microscopy images of the plant cell wall sections reveal extensive swelling during [C2mim][OAc] pretreatment. X-ray diffraction measurements indicate a change in cellulose crystal structure from cellulose I to cellulose II after [C2mim][OAc] pretreatment. Enzymatic saccharification of the pretreated material produced increased sugar yields and improved hydrolysis kinetics after [C2mim][OAc] pretreatment. Conclusion: These results provide new insight into the mechanism of ionic liquid pretreatment and reaffirm that this approach may be promising for the production of cellulosic biofuels from woody biomass.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4155/bfs.09.5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Total time requirement for two-stage simultaneous dissolution/saccharification plus enzymatic saccharification was 3.5-5 h, significantly shorter than enzymatic saccharification alone but with similar selectivity.

    “The total time requirement was 3.5-5 h (0.5-1 h for the dissolution/acid hydrolysis and 3-4 h for the enzymatic hydrolysis) which is significantly shorter than enzymatic saccharification alone but with a similar selectivity.”

    From Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquids (2013) · cites this paper as [154]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 135

Authors
Çetinkol, Ö. P., Dibble, D. C., Cheng, G., Kent, M. S., Knierim, B., Auer, M., Wemmer, D. E., Pelton, J. G., Melnichenko, Y. B., Ralph, J., Simmons, B. A., & Holmes, B. M.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • Sandia National Laboratories California (US)
  • QB3 (US)
  • Spallation Neutron Source (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Biofuels
Published
2010-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
33-46
ISSN
  • 1759-7269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-7277
OpenAlex
W2028879322
Cited by
135
References
67
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biofuels (publishedVersion)
  • OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Keywords
ionic liquid pretreatment, Eucalyptus globulus, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate, xylan deacetylation, syringyl/guaiacyl ratio, cellulose crystallinity, enzymatic saccharification, cellulosic biofuels, woody biomass, cell wall swelling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review