Understanding the impact of ionic liquid pretreatment on eucalyptus
Abstract
Background: The development of cost-competitive biofuels necessitates the realization of advanced biomass pretreatment technologies. Ionic liquids provide a basis for one of the most promising pretreatment technologies and are known to allow effective processing of cellulose and some biomass species. Results & discussion: Here, we demonstrate that the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methyl imidazolium acetate, [C2mim][OAc], induces structural changes at the molecular level in the cell wall of Eucalyptus globulus. Deacetylation of xylan, acetylation of the lignin units, selective removal of guaiacyl units (increasing the syringyl:guaiacyl ratio) and decreased β-ether content were the most prominent changes observed. Scanning electron microscopy images of the plant cell wall sections reveal extensive swelling during [C2mim][OAc] pretreatment. X-ray diffraction measurements indicate a change in cellulose crystal structure from cellulose I to cellulose II after [C2mim][OAc] pretreatment. Enzymatic saccharification of the pretreated material produced increased sugar yields and improved hydrolysis kinetics after [C2mim][OAc] pretreatment. Conclusion: These results provide new insight into the mechanism of ionic liquid pretreatment and reaffirm that this approach may be promising for the production of cellulosic biofuels from woody biomass.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Total time requirement for two-stage simultaneous dissolution/saccharification plus enzymatic saccharification was 3.5-5 h, significantly shorter than enzymatic saccharification alone but with similar selectivity.
“The total time requirement was 3.5-5 h (0.5-1 h for the dissolution/acid hydrolysis and 3-4 h for the enzymatic hydrolysis) which is significantly shorter than enzymatic saccharification alone but with a similar selectivity.”
From Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquids (2013) · cites this paper as [154]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 135
- Authors
- Çetinkol, Ö. P., Dibble, D. C., Cheng, G., Kent, M. S., Knierim, B., Auer, M., Wemmer, D. E., Pelton, J. G., Melnichenko, Y. B., Ralph, J., Simmons, B. A., & Holmes, B. M.
- Affiliations
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- Sandia National Laboratories California (US)
- QB3 (US)
- Spallation Neutron Source (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biofuels
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-46
- ISSN
- 1759-7269 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-7277
- OpenAlex
- W2028879322
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 10.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biofuels (publishedVersion)
- OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Keywords
- ionic liquid pretreatment, Eucalyptus globulus, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate, xylan deacetylation, syringyl/guaiacyl ratio, cellulose crystallinity, enzymatic saccharification, cellulosic biofuels, woody biomass, cell wall swelling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review