Advances in metabolite identification
Abstract
One of the central challenges to metabolomics is metabolite identification. Regardless of whether one uses so-called 'targeted' or 'untargeted' metabolomics, eventually all paths lead to the requirement of identifying (and quantifying) certain key metabolites. Indeed, without metabolite identification, the results of any metabolomic analysis are biologically and chemically uninterpretable. Given the chemical diversity of most metabolomes and the character of most metabolomic data, metabolite identification is intrinsically difficult. Consequently a great deal of effort in metabolomics over the past decade has been focused on making metabolite identification better, faster and cheaper. This review describes some of the newly emerging techniques or technologies in metabolomics that are making metabolite identification easier and more robust. In particular, it focuses on advances in metabolite identification that have occurred over the past 2 to 3 years concerning the technologies, methodologies and software as applied to NMR, MS and separation science. The strengths and limitations of some of these approaches are discussed along with some of the important trends in metabolite identification.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
NMR spectroscopy and MS are the two essential tools for elucidating the structure of unknown metabolites in metabolomic studies.
“NMR spectroscopy and MS are the 2 essential tools for elucidation of the structure of unknown metabolites in metabolomic studies (140, 141).”
From The food metabolome: a window over dietary exposure (2014) · cites this paper as [141]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 93 · Cited by 284
- Authors
- Wishart, D. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Wishart, David S
- ORCID
- Wishart, David S
- Venue
- Bioanalysis
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1769-1782
- ISSN
- 1757-6180 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-6199
- OpenAlex
- W2007646009
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bioanalysis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NPARC (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Health Research and the National Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Keywords
- metabolite identification, metabolomics, targeted metabolomics, untargeted metabolomics, NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, separation science
- MeSH terms
- Chromatography, Liquid, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Software, Mass Spectrometry, Metabolomics, Metabolome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review