Adverse event reporting in patients treated with levothyroxine: results of the pharmacovigilance task force survey of the American Thyroid Association, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, and the Endocrine Society
Abstract
Objective To survey physicians to determine whether potency and consistency issues with levothyroxine sodium (LT4) have been resolved and to assess current experience regarding safety of substituting LT4 products.Methods Members of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American Thyroid Association, and The Endocrine Society collaborated to create a survey instrument that would effectively sample the clinical experience of their society members and frequent prescribers of LT4. More than 18,000 e-mailed requests for information were generated, and the Web sites of each society provided links to the data collection form. The survey provided an opportunity to collect clinical observations of adverse events or product availability problems from physicians caring for patients with thyroid disease who required use of contemporary LT4 preparations.Results After adjustment for known reasons for unstable results from thyroid function tests, 199 reports of adverse events associated with changes in thyrotropin values were further analyzed. One hundred seventy-seven reports (88.9%) were associated with a change in the source of LT4; no change was noted in 21 (10.6%). Details regarding the circumstances of the change were provided in 167 of the 177 reports (94.4%), The reporting physicians themselves or their office staff had changed the LT4 preparation in only 1 of the 167 cases (0.6%). The remainder of changes had been made by the patient's pharmacy, either with the physician's knowledge (in 13 of 167 cases [7.8%]) or without his/her knowledge (in 153 of 167 cases [91.6%]). Fifty-four of 199 cases (27.1%) described serious adverse events; 52 of these (96.3%) were associated with a substitution of one LT4 preparation for another.Conclusions The clinical use of contemporary LT4 products continues to be associated with some adverse outcomes. A small number of reports were associated with continued use of the same LT4 products. The most frequently reported adverse outcomes were associated with the approved generic substitution of LT4 products, frequently without the prescribing physician's knowledge.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anecdotal reports of serum TSH changes when LT4 is changed between brand name and generic products have been gathered using an independent 'Thyroid Pharmacovigilance' website.
“Similar anecdotal reports of changes in serum TSH when a patient's LT4 is changed either from one brand name to another, or from a brand name to generic product, or from one generic to another have been gathered using an independent ''Thyroid Pharmacovigilance'' website (171).”
From Guidelines for the Treatment of Hypothyroidism: Prepared by the American Thyroid Association Task Force on Thyroid Hormone Replacement (2014) · cites this paper as [171]
As reported in US studies, 20% of patients switch to another LT4 generic preparation at least once within the first year of initiating therapy, and a change in the LT4 preparation is the leading cause (56.0%) of the TH level fluctuation observed in LT4-treated patients.
“As reported in US studies, 20% of patients switch to another LT4 generic preparation at least once within the first year of initiating therapy, and a change in the LT4 preparation is the leading cause (56.0%) of the TH level fluctuation observed in LT4-treated patients (118, 119).”
From Levothyroxine: conventional and novel drug delivery formulations. (2023) · cites this paper as [118]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 56
- Authors
- Hennessey, J. V., Malabanan, A. O., Haugen, B. R., & Levy, E. G.
- Affiliations
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- University of Miami (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hennessey, James V.
- Venue
- Endocrine Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 357-370
- ISSN
- 1530-891X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006295413
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Endocrine Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
- Keywords
- levothyroxine, adverse drug reactions, drug substitution, generic substitution, thyroid function tests, thyroid-stimulating hormone, thyroid dysfunction, pharmacovigilance, physician survey
- MeSH terms
- Data Collection, Humans, Societies, Medical, Thyroxine, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review