Cited by 56Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

Adverse event reporting in patients treated with levothyroxine: results of the pharmacovigilance task force survey of the American Thyroid Association, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, and the Endocrine Society

Hennessey, James V., Malabanan, Alan O., Haugen, Bryan R., Levy, Elliot G.·2010·Endocrine Practice

Abstract

Objective To survey physicians to determine whether potency and consistency issues with levothyroxine sodium (LT4) have been resolved and to assess current experience regarding safety of substituting LT4 products.Methods Members of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American Thyroid Association, and The Endocrine Society collaborated to create a survey instrument that would effectively sample the clinical experience of their society members and frequent prescribers of LT4. More than 18,000 e-mailed requests for information were generated, and the Web sites of each society provided links to the data collection form. The survey provided an opportunity to collect clinical observations of adverse events or product availability problems from physicians caring for patients with thyroid disease who required use of contemporary LT4 preparations.Results After adjustment for known reasons for unstable results from thyroid function tests, 199 reports of adverse events associated with changes in thyrotropin values were further analyzed. One hundred seventy-seven reports (88.9%) were associated with a change in the source of LT4; no change was noted in 21 (10.6%). Details regarding the circumstances of the change were provided in 167 of the 177 reports (94.4%), The reporting physicians themselves or their office staff had changed the LT4 preparation in only 1 of the 167 cases (0.6%). The remainder of changes had been made by the patient's pharmacy, either with the physician's knowledge (in 13 of 167 cases [7.8%]) or without his/her knowledge (in 153 of 167 cases [91.6%]). Fifty-four of 199 cases (27.1%) described serious adverse events; 52 of these (96.3%) were associated with a substitution of one LT4 preparation for another.Conclusions The clinical use of contemporary LT4 products continues to be associated with some adverse outcomes. A small number of reports were associated with continued use of the same LT4 products. The most frequently reported adverse outcomes were associated with the approved generic substitution of LT4 products, frequently without the prescribing physician's knowledge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4158/ep0362.or

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anecdotal reports of serum TSH changes when LT4 is changed between brand name and generic products have been gathered using an independent 'Thyroid Pharmacovigilance' website.

    “Similar anecdotal reports of changes in serum TSH when a patient's LT4 is changed either from one brand name to another, or from a brand name to generic product, or from one generic to another have been gathered using an independent ''Thyroid Pharmacovigilance'' website (171).”
  • As reported in US studies, 20% of patients switch to another LT4 generic preparation at least once within the first year of initiating therapy, and a change in the LT4 preparation is the leading cause (56.0%) of the TH level fluctuation observed in LT4-treated patients.

    “As reported in US studies, 20% of patients switch to another LT4 generic preparation at least once within the first year of initiating therapy, and a change in the LT4 preparation is the leading cause (56.0%) of the TH level fluctuation observed in LT4-treated patients (118, 119).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 56

Authors
Hennessey, J. V., Malabanan, A. O., Haugen, B. R., & Levy, E. G.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Hennessey, James V.
Venue
Endocrine Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
357-370
ISSN
1530-891X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006295413
Cited by
56
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrine Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Keywords
levothyroxine, adverse drug reactions, drug substitution, generic substitution, thyroid function tests, thyroid-stimulating hormone, thyroid dysfunction, pharmacovigilance, physician survey
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Humans, Societies, Medical, Thyroxine, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review