Cited by 87Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPatient Safety and Medication Errors

Insulin Stacking Versus Therapeutic Accumulation: Understanding the Differences

Heise, Tim, Meneghini, Luigi F.·2014·Endocrine Practice

Abstract

Objective The build-up in insulin levels following repeated injection of prandial insulin at close intervals--referred to as insulin stacking--can increase the risk of hypoglycemia. With the development of basal insulins with a half-life > 24 hours and a duration of action > 40 hours, clinicians may be concerned about stacking when these long-acting formulations are administered once daily. The objective of this review is to clarify the difference between inappropriate insulin stacking when shorter-acting insulin formulations are repeatedly used to correct hyperglycemia and the appropriate accumulation of long-acting insulin formulations dosed to steady-state pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles. Methods Relevant literature on insulin stacking, glucose-clamp studies, and clinical studies of insulin, in conjunction with the clinical experience of the authors, were used to present an overview of insulin PK properties and the effects of appropriate and inappropriate dosing intervals on steady-state conditions and likely clinical outcomes. Results Clinical studies confirm theoretical PK principles showing that unwanted insulin stacking (excessive concentrations) for basal insulin can be avoided by following recommended dosing and titration algorithms. Long-acting basal insulins need more time to reach steady state than shorter-acting basal insulins but then show reduced peak-trough fluctuations, translating into more consistent biologic action over a 24-hour period. Conclusion The unwanted stacking and consequent hypoglycemia that can occur when correctional doses of rapid-acting insulin are administered at close intervals does not occur when long-acting basal insulins are dosed in appropriate amounts and adjusted at appropriate time intervals (e.g., insulin stacking, insulin administration, diabetes, ultralong duration of action, hypoglycemia every three or more days), allowing for pharmacologic steady-state accumulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4158/ep13090.ra

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Currently available basal insulins including IGlar and IDet have a comparatively short half-life and a duration of action less than 24 h that does not consistently allow adequate glycaemic control over a full 24-h period with once-daily dosing.

    “These limitations include a comparatively short half-life and a duration of action less than 24 h that does not consistently allow adequate glycaemic control over a full 24-h period with once-daily dosing [1–3].”
  • Basal insulins such as IDeg have a flatter profile owing to reduced fluctuations in their glucose-lowering profile, directly related to their prolonged duration of action.

    “Basal insulins such as IDeg have a flatter profile owing to reduced fluctuations in their glucose-lowering profile. This property is directly related to their prolonged duration of action [1]”
  • One potential concern with a basal insulin with ultra-long duration of action is the risk of insulin stacking, excessive accumulation of insulin and consequent hypoglycaemia.

    “This parameter is clinically relevant because one of the potential concerns with a basal insulin with an ultra-long duration of action (IDeg) is the risk of insulin ‘stacking’; that is, excessive accumulation of insulin, and consequent hypoglycaemia [1].”
  • The ultra-long half-life of IDeg leads to a flat pharmacokinetic profile at steady state, resulting in low fluctuations in glucose-lowering activity across one dosing interval.

    “The ultra-long half-life of IDeg leads to a flat pharmacokinetic profile at SS conditions, resulting in low fluctuations in glucose-lowering activity across one dosing interval [1], as discussed below.”
  • When recommended dosing guidelines and titration algorithms are followed, insulin stacking with IDeg should not occur.

    “In addition, a recent report further indicates that when recommended dosing guidelines and titration algorithms are followed, insulin stacking with IDeg should not occur [1].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 36 · Cited by 87

Authors
Heise, T., & Meneghini, L. F.
Affiliations
  • Profil Institute for Metabolic Research (DE)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Heise, Tim
Venue
Endocrine Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
75-83
ISSN
1530-891X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2204634826
Cited by
87
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrine Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
long-acting basal insulin, rapid-acting insulin, insulin pharmacokinetics, hypoglycemia, steady-state accumulation, diabetes management
MeSH terms
Half-Life, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Insulin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review