The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Private Roots of Public Action
Abstract
Why, after several generations of suffrage and a revival of the women's movement in the late 1960s, do women continue to be less politically active than men? The Private Roots of Public Action is the most comprehensive study of this puzzle of unequal participation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791017 · Cited by 1,795
Kahne, J. E., & Sporte, S. E. (2008) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831208316951 · Cited by 601
Uncovering the Origins of the Gender Gap in Political Ambition
FOX, R. L., & LAWLESS, J. L. (2014) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055414000227 · Cited by 385
The Application of Social Role Theory to the Study of Gender in Politics
Schneider, M. C., & Bos, A. L. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12573 · Cited by 240
What Affects Voter Turnout? A Review Article/Meta-Analysis of Aggregate Research
Stockemer, D. (2017) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2016.30 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S.
- Venue
- Harvard University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Harvard University Press
- Published
- 2001-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4213433674
- Cited by
- 930
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.97
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Private Roots of Public Action. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4159/9780674029088
- The paper
- Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (2001). The Private Roots of Public Action. Harvard University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674029088
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
