The DOI matches its Crossref record.
British Naturalists in Qing China
Abstract
This book is the first comprehensive study on this topic. In a series of vivid chapters, Fa-ti Fan examines the research of British naturalists in China in relation to the history of natural history, of empire, and of Sino–Western relations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Most of the French missionaries in China were officially ordered to leave the mainland due to the Chinese Rites Controversy ending in the early eighteenth century.$^{6}$^{3}”
From Transnational Travels of the Caterpillar Fungus in the Fifteenth through Nineteenth Centuries (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“Eventually the Catholic missionary enterprise was officially banned for about a century, and the political conditions for private missionary work and social activities of the French missionaries that were allowed to stay in Beijing also seriously deteriorated.”
From Transnational Travels of the Caterpillar Fungus in the Fifteenth through Nineteenth Centuries (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transnational Travels of the Caterpillar Fungus in the Fifteenth through Nineteenth Centuries
Lu, D. (2017) · Asian Medicine · doi:10.1163/15734218-12341387 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- FAN, F.-T.
- Corresponding author
- FAN, Fa-ti
- Venue
- Harvard University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Harvard University Press
- Published
- 2004-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W3153095429
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 5.94
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Natural History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Keywords
- British naturalists, Qing China, history of natural history, imperialism, China–West relations, scientific expeditions, colonial science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
