Democracy Denied, 1905-1915: Intellectuals and the Fate of Democracy
Abstract
Mining newspaper accounts, memoirs, and government reports, Kurzman proposes that the collective agent most directly responsible for democratization was the emerging class of modern intellectuals, a group that had gained a global identity and a near-messianic sense of mission following the Dreyfus Affair of 1898.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 'retrieval' of the international by third generation revolutionary theorists has been extended by a number of fourth generation theorists.
“The 'retrieval' of the international by third generation revolutionary theorists has been extended by a number of fourth generation theorists (e.g. Goldstone 2001, 2009, 2014, 2015; Foran 2005; Kurzman, 2008; Beck 2011, 2014; Ritter 2015).”
From Within and Beyond the “Fourth Generation” of Revolutionary Theory (2016) · cites this paper as Kurzman 2008
Despite increasing attention to the multiple connections between revolutions and the international, this relationship remains unevenly examined, being highly visible in some work yet all but invisible in others.
“First, despite increasing attention to the multiple connections between revolutions and the international, this relationship remains unevenly examined, being highly visible in some work (e.g. Foran 2005; Kurzman 2008; Goldstone 2014; Beck 2014; Ritter 2015), yet all but invisible in others (e.g. Parsa 2000; Goodwin 2001; Thompson 2004; Slater 2010).”
From Within and Beyond the “Fourth Generation” of Revolutionary Theory (2016) · cites this paper as Kurzman 2008
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 77
- Authors
- KURZMAN, C.
- Corresponding author
- KURZMAN, Charles
- ORCID
- KURZMAN, Charles
- Venue
- Harvard University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Harvard University Press
- Published
- 2008-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4213436176
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 9.11
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › French Historical and Cultural Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
- Keywords
- democratization, modern intellectuals, Dreyfus affair, intellectual history, political thought, Jewish intellectuals, late 19th century, early 20th century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
