A Hacker Manifesto
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
La reapropiación del conocimiento por parte de Cybercirujas desafía la escasez generada artificialmente por la propiedad intelectual (Wark, 2004), y es el impulso que transforma la reparación de un dispositivo en un potente acto de militancia política.
“Esta reapropiación del conocimiento desafía la escasez generada artificialmente por la propiedad intelectual (Wark, 2004), y es el impulso que transforma la reparación de un dispositivo en un potente acto de militancia política.”
From El movimiento Cybercirujas de Argentina (2026) · cites this paper as Wark, 2004
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 288
- Authors
- Wark, M.
- Corresponding author
- Wark, McKenzie
- ORCID
- Wark, McKenzie
- Venue
- Harvard University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Harvard University Press
- Published
- 2004-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4207018759
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 8.69
- Type
- book
- Language
- es
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › History of Computing Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Keywords
- hacking, hackers, hacker culture, computer ethics, free software, open source
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
