The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Political Conduct
Abstract
This book explores how the processes and practices of politics shape political values, such as liberty, justice, equality, and democracy. Mining the history of political episodes and political thinkers, including Caesar and Machiavelli, Mark Philp argues that it is through political activity that "values are articulated and embraced, and they become powerful motivating forces." Political Conduct is thus an attempt to inform and enrich political theory--to show that its principles would be more relevant to actual politics if they were immersed in history and practice. Philp argues for a separation between moral and political philosophy and proposes that a less abstract and ideal approach to political philosophy than that provided by Rawls, Dworkin, Nagel, and Cohen would be more useful in illuminating the conduct of politicians and the limitations on what they can achieve.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Machiavelli's normative aim is thus to tell a situated agent what ought to be done, given what all other actors are likely to be doing (Philp, 2007, 2010).”
From No Virtue Like Resilience: Machiavelli’s Realistic Justification of Democracy (2024) · cites this paper as Philp, 2007
Citations
Cited by
No Virtue Like Resilience: Machiavelli’s Realistic Justification of Democracy
Burelli, C. (2024) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00323217231191396 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Philp, M.
- Corresponding author
- Philp, Mark
- ORCID
- Philp, Mark
- Venue
- Harvard University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Harvard University Press
- Published
- 2007-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4301731367
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Influence
- Keywords
- political values, political behavior, political theory, ethics, freedom, justice, equality, democracy, history of political thought, political action, political realism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.