Cited by 231Colonialism, slavery, and tradeHistorical Economic and Social StudiesHistory of Colonial Brazil

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Accounting for Slavery: Masters and Management

Open access
Rosenthal, Caitlin·2018·Harvard University Press eBooks

Abstract

Caitlin Rosenthal explores quantitative management practices on West Indian and Southern plantations, showing how planter-capitalists built sophisticated organizations and used complex accounting tools. By demonstrating that business innovation can be a byproduct of bondage Rosenthal further erodes the false boundary between capitalism and slavery.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4159/9780674988590

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rosenthal, C.
Corresponding author
Rosenthal, Caitlin
Venue
Harvard University Press eBooks
Published
2018-12-31
OpenAlex
W4256086545
Cited by
231
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13
FWCI
23.58
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Colonial Brazil
Keywords
slavery, quantitative management, plantations, business innovation, Capitalism and Slavery, West Indies, Southern United States, economic history of slavery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review