CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 264Education, Philosophy, and SocietyTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducational Theory and Curriculum Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Teaching and Its Predicaments

Cohen, David K.·2011·Harvard University Press eBooks
DOI 10.4159/harvard.9780674062788
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Ever since Socrates, teaching has been a difficult and even dangerous profession. Why is good teaching such hard work? In this provocative, witty, and sometimes rueful book, David K. Cohen writes about the predicaments that teachers face. Like therapists, social workers, and pastors, teachers embark on a mission of human improvement. They aim to deepen knowledge, broaden understanding, sharpen skills, and change behavior. One predicament is that no matter how great their expertise, teachers depend on the cooperation and intelligence of their students, yet there is much that students do not know. To teach responsibly, teachers must cultivate a kind of mental double vision: distancing themselves from their own knowledge to understand students’ thinking, yet using their knowledge to guide their teaching. Another predicament is that although attention to students’ thinking improves the chances of learning, it also increases the uncertainty and complexity of the job. The circumstances in which teachers and students work make a difference. Teachers and students are better able to manage these predicaments if they have resources—common curricula, intelligent assessments, and teacher education tied to both—that support responsible teaching. Yet for most of U.S. history those resources have been in short supply, and many current accountability policies are little help. With a keen eye for the moment-to-moment challenges, Cohen explores what “responsible teaching” can be, the kind of mind reading it seems to demand, and the complex social resources it requires.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4159/harvard.9780674062788

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 264

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Cohen, D. K.
Corresponding author
Cohen, David K.
Venue
Harvard University Press eBooks
Publisher
Harvard University Press
Published
2011-08-31
DOI
10.4159/harvard.9780674062788
OpenAlex
W2503349332
Cited by
263
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
19.21
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Keywords
teaching, student thinking, teacher-student relationship, teacher expertise, course program, assessment, teacher professional development, educational accountability, educational reform, Socrates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review