9 Social and Economic Constraints on Child Life among the !Kung
Abstract
The usual approach in studies of socialization is to look at the interaction among cultural values, social structure, and child-training practices. The approach used here evolved during my two years in the field living with the !Kung, when it became clear to me that the major constraints on child life derived from the nature of adult work and from the organization of people in space. By the "nature of adult work" I refer to the hunting and gathering subsistence economy, to the rhythm of work routines, and to the accommodation to scarce and unevenly distributed water sources. By "organization of people in space" I refer to the actual settlement pattern of !Kung living groups and to the overlying network of social use to which the living space is put. In approaching child life through a focus on these more concrete features of social life, I hope not to skimp on the rich ethnographic detail that can be conveyed in writings about child-training practices in other cultures. Instead, by specifying more fully the stage settings and the traffic rhythms of the social actors in camp life, I hope to open to the reader a view of the niche of children in this society.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ethnographic and geographical studies suggest that children's movements were not entirely unrestricted; some spaces were freely accessible, while others required parental approval or were off-limits.
“Ethnographic and geographical studies suggest that children's movements were not entirely unrestricted.While some spaces were freely accessible, others required parental approval or were off-limits altogether (e.g., Draper 1976:200-202, 205-206;Stone 1977:21-22;Hart 1979;Moore 1986:40-41;Guinan 1996:61;Lancy 1996:72-75, 86;Alison 1999:1-2;Jones 2000:29-47;Punch 2000:51-54).”
From The Importance of an ‘Unimportant’ Toy: Children in the Ancient Domestic Sphere (2026) · cites this paper as Draper 1976
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0319 · Cited by 970 · see citing works
Hunting, healing, and hxaro exchange
Wiessner, P. (2002) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(02)00096-x · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Demography and childcare in preindustrial societies
Hewlett, B. S. (1991) · Journal of Anthropological Research · doi:10.1086/jar.47.1.3630579 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
The Importance of an ‘Unimportant’ Toy: Children in the Ancient Domestic Sphere
Avissar Lewis, R. S. (2026) · 'Atiqot · doi:10.70967/2948-040x.2521
- Authors
- Draper, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
- Corresponding author
- Patricia Draper
- Venue
- Kalahari Hunter-Gatherers
- Publisher
- Harvard University Press
- Published
- 1976-12-31
- Pages
- 199-217
- OpenAlex
- W2982393
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 21.13
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education
- Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Keywords
- child life, child socialization, hunting and gathering, subsistence economy, settlement patterns, spatial organization, water sources, work routines, camp life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review