The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Selected Studies of the Principle of Relative Frequency in Language
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
THE POPULATION FREQUENCIES OF SPECIES AND THE ESTIMATION OF POPULATION PARAMETERS
GOOD, I. J. (1953) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/40.3-4.237 · Cited by 3,437
A survey of modern authorship attribution methods
Stamatatos, E. (2009) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21001 · Cited by 1,176
Automated Text Analysis for Consumer Research
Humphreys, A., & Wang, R. J.-H. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx104 · Cited by 636
Computational methods in authorship attribution
Koppel, M., Schler, J., & Argamon, S. (2009) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20961 · Cited by 528
Sharp transition towards shared vocabularies in multi-agent systems
Baronchelli, A., Felici, M., Loreto, V., Caglioti, E., & Steels, L. (2006) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2006/06/p06014 · Cited by 402
Metadata
- Authors
- Kingsley Zipf, G.
- Venue
- Harvard University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Harvard University Press
- Published
- 1932-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W2037959956
- Cited by
- 686
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selected Studies of the Principle of Relative Frequency in Language. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4159/harvard.9780674434929
- The paper
- Kingsley Zipf, G. (1932). Selected Studies of the Principle of Relative Frequency in Language. Harvard University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674434929
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
