CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 70Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesMedical History and InnovationsHistory of Science and Medicine

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Catching Babies: The Professionalization of Childbirth, 1870–1920

Borst, Charlotte G.·1995·Harvard University Press eBooks
DOI 10.4159/harvard.9780674733480
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Childbirth is a quintessential family event that simultaneously holds great promise and runs the risk of danger. By the late nineteenth century, the birthing room had become a place where the goals of the new scientific professional could be demonstrated, but where traditional female knowledge was in conflict with the new ways. Here the choice of attendants and their practices defined gender, ethnicity, class, and the role of the professional. Using the methodology of social science theory, particularly quantitative statistical analysis and historical demography, Charlotte Borst examines the effect of gender, culture, and class on the transition to physician-attended childbirth. Earlier studies have focused on physician opposition to midwifery, devoting little attention to the training for and actual practice of midwifery. As a result, until now we knew little about the actual conditions of the midwife's education and practice. Catching Babies is the first study to examine the move to physician-attended birth within the context of a particular community. It focuses on four representative counties in Wisconsin to study both midwives and physicians within the context of their community. Borst finds that midwives were not pushed out of practice by elitist or misogynist obstetricians. Instead, their traditional, artisanal skills ceased to be valued by a society that had come to embrace the model of disinterested, professional science. The community that had previously hired midwi…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4159/harvard.9780674733480

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Borst, C. G.
Corresponding author
Borst, Charlotte G.
Venue
Harvard University Press eBooks
Publisher
Harvard University Press
Published
1995-12-31
DOI
10.4159/harvard.9780674733480
OpenAlex
W2325848300
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.71
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medical History and Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
Keywords
midwifery, midwifery education, history of obstetrics, Wisconsin, 19th century, childbirth practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review