Cited by 211Race, Genetics, and SocietyMedical History and ResearchRace, History, and American Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Myth of Race: The Troubling Persistence of an Unscientific Idea

Sussman, Robert Wald·2014·Harvard University Press eBooks

Abstract

Although eugenics is now widely discredited, some groups and individuals claim a new scientific basis for old racist assumptions. Pondering the continuing influence of racist research and thought, despite all evidence to the contrary, Robert Sussman explains why—when it comes to race—too many people still mistake bigotry for science.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4159/harvard.9780674736160

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Sussman, R. W.
Corresponding author
Sussman, Robert Wald
Venue
Harvard University Press eBooks
Published
2014-12-31
OpenAlex
W4234576843
Cited by
211
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.62
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medical History and Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
Keywords
race, eugenics, racism, scientific racism, racial theory, pseudoscience, human evolution, social construction of race

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review