The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Immune signature of tumor infiltrating immune cells in renal cancer
Open accessAbstract
Tumor-associated immune cells have been discussed as an essential factor for the prediction of the outcome of tumor patients. Lymphocyte-specific genes are associated with a favorable prognosis in colorectal cancer but with poor survival in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Flow cytometric analyses combined with immunohistochemistry were performed to study the phenotypic profiles of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and the frequency of T cells and macrophages in RCC lesions. Data were correlated with clinicopathological parameters and survival of patients. Comparing oncocytoma and clear cell (cc)RCC, T cell numbers as well as activation-associated T cell markers were higher in ccRCC, whereas the frequency of NK cells was higher in oncocytoma. An intratumoral increase of T cell numbers was found with higher tumor grades (G1:G2:G3/4 = 1:3:4). Tumor-associated macrophages slightly increased with dedifferentiation, although the macrophage-to-T cell ratio was highest in G1 tumor lesions. A high expression of CD57 was found in T cells of early tumor grades, whereas T cells in dedifferentiated RCC lesions expressed higher levels of CD69 and CTLA4. TIL composition did not differ between older (>70 y) and younger (<58 y) patients. Enhanced patients' survival was associated with a higher percentage of tumor infiltrating NK cells and Th1 markers, e.g. HLA-DR+ and CXCR3+ T cells, whereas a high number of T cells, especially with high CD69 expression correlated with a worse prognosis of patients. Our results suggest that immunomonitoring of RCC patients might represent a useful tool for the prediction of the outcome of RCC patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hsieh, J. J., Purdue, M. P., Signoretti, S., Swanton, C., Albiges, L., Schmidinger, M., Heng, D. Y., Larkin, J., & Ficarra, V. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.9 · Cited by 2,426
Natural killer cells in antitumour adoptive cell immunotherapy
Laskowski, T. J., Biederstädt, A., & Rezvani, K. (2022) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-022-00491-0 · Cited by 773
The Cancer Genome Atlas Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Renal Cell Carcinoma
Ricketts, C. J., De Cubas, A. A., Fan, H., Smith, C. C., Lang, M., Reznik, E., Bowlby, R., Gibb, E. A., Akbani, R., Beroukhim, R., et al. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.032 · Cited by 734
HYPE or HOPE: the prognostic value of infiltrating immune cells in cancer
Barnes, T. A., & Amir, E. (2017) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2017.220 · Cited by 432
Raghubar, A. M., Matigian, N. A., Crawford, J., Francis, L., Ellis, R., Healy, H. G., Kassianos, A. J., Ng, M. S. Y., Roberts, M. J., Wood, S., et al. (2023) · npj Precision Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41698-023-00441-5 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Geissler, K., Fornara, P., Lautenschläger, C., Holzhausen, H.-J., Seliger, B., & Riemann, D.
- Venue
- OncoImmunology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-01-02
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e985082
- ISSN
- 2162-4011 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-402X
- OpenAlex
- W1986935067
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immune signature of tumor infiltrating immune cells in renal cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4161/2162402x.2014.985082
- The paper
- Geissler, K., Fornara, P., Lautenschläger, C., Holzhausen, H.-J., Seliger, B., & Riemann, D. (2015). Immune signature of tumor infiltrating immune cells in renal cancer. OncoImmunology. https://doi.org/10.4161/2162402x.2014.985082
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.