Cited by 155Autophagy in Disease and TherapyCell Image Analysis TechniquesGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms

A novel method for autophagy detection in primary cells: Impaired levels of macroautophagy in immunosenescent T cells

Open access
Phadwal, Kanchan, Alegre-Abarrategui, Javier, Watson, Alexander Scarth, Pike, Luke, Anbalagan, Selvakumar, Hammond, Ester M., Wade-Martins, Richard, McMichael, Andrew +2 more·2012·Autophagy

Abstract

Autophagy is a conserved constitutive cellular process, responsible for the degradation of dysfunctional proteins and organelles. Autophagy plays a role in many diseases such as neurodegeneration and cancer; however, to date, conventional autophagy detection techniques are not suitable for clinical samples. We have developed a high throughput, statistically robust technique that quantitates autophagy in primary human leukocytes using the Image stream, an imaging flow cytometer. We validate this method on cell lines and primary cells knocked down for essential autophagy genes. Also, using this method we show that T cells have higher autophagic activity than B cells. Furthermore our results indicate that healthy primary senescent CD8(+) T cells have decreased autophagic levels correlating with increased DNA damage, which may explain features of the senescent immune system and its declining function with age. This technique will allow us, for the first time, to measure autophagy levels in diseases with a known link to autophagy, while also determining the contribution of autophagy to the efficacy of drugs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/auto.18935

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of human T cells have associated aging with changes in autophagy, membrane raft properties, and reactive oxygen production, but these examined total T cell populations irrespective of naive or memory phenotype and are difficult to interpret.

    “Studies of human T cells have associated aging with changes in autophagy, in membrane properties to form rafts, and in reactive oxygen production (Fulop et al., 2014; Phadwal et al., 2012); however, these studies examined total T cell populations, irrespective of naive or memory phenotypes, and are therefore difficult to interpret.”

    From Successful and Maladaptive T Cell Aging (2017) · cites this paper as Phadwal et al., 2012

  • Senescent CD8+ T cells display both low autophagic activity and lack mTORC1 activity.

    “However senescent CD8 + T cells displayed both low autophagic activity [25, 65] and also lack mTORC1 activity [25].”
  • Autophagy falls with age, including in human CD8+ T cells.

    “Autophagy, degrading bulk cytoplasmic material by delivering it to the lysosomes, falls with age, including in human CD8+ T cells [105].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 155

Authors
Phadwal, K., Alegre-Abarrategui, J., Watson, A. S., Pike, L., Anbalagan, S., Hammond, E. M., Wade-Martins, R., McMichael, A., Klenerman, P., & Simon, A. K.
Affiliations
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Simon, Anna Katharina
Venue
Autophagy
Published
2012-04
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
677-689
ISSN
  • 1554-8627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-8635
OpenAlex
W2037959286
Cited by
155
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Autophagy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (091663)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0510-10204)
  • Parkinson's UK (J-0901)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/G021422/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Keywords
imaging flow cytometry, high-throughput quantification, T cells, B cells, CD8+ T cell senescence, DNA damage, aging immune system, drug efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Autophagy, B-Lymphocytes, Biological Assay, Cells, Cultured, Histones, Humans, Middle Aged, T-Lymphocytes, Reproducibility of Results, Cellular Senescence, Mice, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review