CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 447

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does bafilomycin A 1 block the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes?

Klionsky, Daniel J., Elazar, Zvulun, Seglen, Per O., Rubinsztein, David C.·2008·Autophagy
DOI 10.4161/auto.6845
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/auto.6845

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Crosstalk between the proteasomal and autophagic systems does not appreciably affect the results obtained in the long-lived protein degradation assay.

    “thus suggesting that the crosstalk between the proteasomal and autophagic systems does not appreciably affect the results obtained in the long-lived protein degradation assay (although this does not exclude the possibility that this may occur under other conditions, so this needs to be tested from case to case).”

    From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [218]

  • 3-MA could have some autophagy-independent effects in particular settings.

    “In addition, because 3-MA could have some autophagy-independent effects in particular settings it is advisable to verify that the 3-MA-sensitive degradation is also sensitive to specific class III PtdIns3K inhibitors such as SAR-405, and to general lysosomal inhibitors (such as NH4Cl or leupeptin) [26,218].”

    From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [218]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Jahreiss L, Menzies FM, Rubinsztein DC. The itinerary of autophagosomes: from peripheral formation to kiss-and-run fusion with lysosomes. Traffic 2008; 9:574-87.
  2. Kawai A, Uchiyama H, Takano S, Nakamura N, Ohkuma S. Autophagosome-lysosome fusion depends on the pH in acidic compartments in CHO cells. Autophagy 2007; 3:154-7.
  3. Mousavi SA, Kjeken R, Berg TO, Seglen PO, Berg T, Brech A. Effects of inhibitors of the vacuolar proton pump on hepatic heterophagy and autophagy. Biochim Biophy Acta 2001; 1510:243-57.
  4. Clague MJ, Urbe S, Aniento F, Gruenberg J. Vacuolar ATPase activity is required for endo- somal carrier vesicle formation. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:21-4.
  5. van Deurs B, Holm PK, Sandvig K. Inhibition of the vacuolar H+-ATPase with bafilomycin reduces delivery of internalized molecules from mature multivesicular endosomes to lyso- somes in HEp-2 cells. Eur J Cell Biol 1996; 69:343-50.
  6. van Weert AWM, Dunn KW, Geuze HJ, Maxfield FR, Stoorvogel W. Transport from late endosomes to lysosomes, but not sorting of integral membrane proteins in endosomes, depends on the vacuolar proton pump. J Cell Biol 1995; 130:821-34.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Klionsky, D. J., Elazar, Z., Seglen, P. O., & Rubinsztein, D. C.
Venue
Autophagy
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2008-08-22
Volume
4
Issue
7
Pages
849-850
ISSN
  • 1554-8627
  • 1554-8635
DOI
10.4161/auto.6845
Cited by
447
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review