The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analyzing autophagy in Magnaporthe oryzae
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this case the relative amount of free GFP and the complete fusion protein is the relevant parameter for quantification; although it may not be possible to detect clear changes in the amount of the full-length chimera, especially under conditions of limited flux [41,53].”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [53]
In the citing paper
“Because the pH in the yeast vacuole is higher than that in mammalian or D. discoideum lysosomes, the levels of free GFP fragments are detectable in yeast even in the absence of lysosomotropic compounds [53].”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [53]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Klionsky DJ, Cuervo AM, Seglen PO. Methods for monitoring autophagy from yeast to human. Autophagy 2007; 3:181-206.
- Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Levine B. Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell 2010; 140:313- 26.
- Talbot NJ, Ebbole DJ, Hamer JE. Identification and characterization of MPG1, a gene involved in pathogenicity from the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Cell 1993; 5:1575-90.
- Chen H, Fliegel L. Expression, purification and reconstitution of the Na + /H + exchanger sod2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biochem 2008; 319:79-86.
- Pall ML, Brunelli JP. A series of six compact fungal transformation vectors containing polylinkers with multiple unique restriction sites. Fungal Genet Newsl 1993; 40:59-62.
- Veneault-Fourrey C, Barooah M, Egan M, Wakley G, Talbot NJ. Autophagic fungal cell death is necessary for infection by the rice blast fungus. Science 2006; 312:580-3.
- Liu TB, Lu JP, Liu XH, Min H, Lin FC. A simple and effective method for total RNA isolation of appres- soria in Magnaporthe oryzae. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2008; 9:811-7.
- Matsuura A, Tsukada M, Wada Y, Ohsumi Y. Apg1p, a novel protein kinase required for the auto- phagic process in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 1997; 192:245-50.
- Howard RJ, Ferrari MA, Roach DH, Money NP. Penetration of hard substrates by a fungus employing enormous turgor pressures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88:11281-4.
- Kim S, Ahn IP, Rho HS, Lee YH. MHP1, a Magnaporthe grisea hydrophobin gene, is required for fungal development and plant colonization. Mol Microbiol 2005; 57:1224-37.
- Balhadère PV, Foster AJ, Talbot NJ. Identification of pathogenicity mutants of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea by insertional mutagenesis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 1999; 12:129-42.
- Kerppola TK. Design and implementation of bimo- lecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays for the visualization of protein interactions in living cells. Nat Protoc 2006; 1:1278-86.
- Biederbick A, Kern HF, Elsasser HP. Monodansylcadaverine (MDC) is a specific in vivo marker for autophagic vacuoles. Eur J Cell Biol 1995; 66:3-14.
- Thines E, Weber RW, Talbot NJ. MAP kinase and protein kinase A-dependent mobilization of triacyl- glycerol and glycogen during appressorium turgor generation by Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Cell 2000; 12:1703-18. References
- Liu TB, Liu XH, Lu JP, Zhang L, Min H, Lin FC. The cysteine protease MoAtg4 interacts with MoAtg8 and is required for differentiation and pathogenesis in Magnaporthe oryzae. Autophagy 2010; 6:74-85.
- Lu JP, Liu XH, Feng XX, Min H, Lin FC. An auto- phagy gene, MgATG5, is required for cell differentia- tion and pathogenesis in Magnaporthe oryzae. Curr Genet 2009; 55:461-73.
- Liu XH, Lu JP, Zhang L, Dong B, Min H, Lin FC. Involvement of a Magnaporthe grisea serine/threonine kinase gene, MgATG1, in appressorium turgor and pathogenesis. Eukaryot Cell 2007; 6:997-1005.
- Klionsky DJ, Abeliovich H, Agostinis P, Agrawal DK, Aliev G, Askew DS, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy in higher eukaryotes. Autophagy 2008; 4:151-75.
- Mizushima N. Methods for monitoring autophagy. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2004; 36:2491-502.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition).
Klionsky, D. J., Abdelmohsen, K., Abe, A., Abedin, M. J., Abeliovich, H., Acevedo Arozena, A., Adachi, H., Adams, C. M., Adams, P. D., Adeli, K., et al. (2016) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356 · Cited by 5,894
Self-citationGuidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy
Klionsky, D. J., Abdalla, F. C., Abeliovich, H., Abraham, R. T., Acevedo-Arozena, A., Adeli, K., Agholme, L., Agnello, M., Agostinis, P., Aguirre-Ghiso, J. A., et al. (2012) · Autophagy · doi:10.4161/auto.19496 · Cited by 3,996
Self-citationGuidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1
Klionsky, D. J., Abdel-Aziz, A. K., Abdelfatah, S., Abdellatif, M., Abdoli, A., Abel, S., Abeliovich, H., Abildgaard, M. H., Abudu, Y. P., Acevedo-Arozena, A., et al. (2021) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280 · Cited by 2,897
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, F., Liu, X.-H., Zhuang, F.-L., Zhu, J., & Lin, F.-C.
- Venue
- Autophagy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 525-530
- ISSN
- 1554-8627
- 1554-8635
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
