The income and production effects of biotech crops globally 1996–2010
Open accessAbstract
A critical feature in evaluating the global value of crop biotechnology in agriculture must include an assessment of its economic impact at the farm level. This paper follows earlier studies which examined economic impacts on yields, key costs of production, direct farm income, indirect (non-pecuniary) farm level income effects and impacts on the production base of the four main crops of soybeans, corn, cotton and canola. The commercialization of biotech crops is continuing to proceed rapidly, with significant changes in the overall level of adoption and impact taking place in 2010. This updated analysis shows that there have been substantial net economic benefits at the farm level amounting to $14 billion in 2010 and $78.4 billion for the 15-year period (in nominal terms). The non-pecuniary benefits associated with the use of the technology have also had a positive impact on adoption (in the US accounting for the equivalent of 22% of the total US direct farm income benefit). Biotech crops are, moreover, making important contributions to increasing global production levels of the four main crops. They have, for example, now added 97.5 million tons and 159 million tons respectively, to the global production of soybeans and corn since the introduction of the technology in the mid-1990s.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research shows that cultivation of GM crops does not pose any specific health or environmental risks, but instead can bring benefits to local farmers.
“However, research shows that cultivation of GM crops does not pose any specific health 21 or environmental risks, but instead can bring benefits to local farmers [8-11].”
From Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition (2015) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 36
- Authors
- Brookes, G., & Barfoot, P.
- Corresponding author
- Brookes, Graham
- ORCID
- Barfoot, Peter
- Venue
- GM Crops & Food
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-10-03
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 265-272
- ISSN
- 2164-5698 (ISSN-L)
- 2164-5701
- OpenAlex
- W1975219047
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 8.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- GM crops & food (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
- Keywords
- genetically modified crops, farm income, production costs, non-monetary benefits, crop yield, soybean, maize, cotton, canola, technology adoption, global crop production, economic impact of biotechnology
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Biotechnology, Income, United States, Crops, Agricultural, Internationality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review