Cited by 74Gut microbiota and healthInfant Nutrition and HealthProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Facultative to strict anaerobes ratio in the preterm infant microbiota: A target for intervention?

Open access
Arboleya, Silvia, Solís, Gonzalo, Fernández, Nuria, de los Reyes-Gavilán, Clara G., Gueimonde, Miguel·2012·Gut Microbes

Abstract

During recent years there has been an increasing interest on the development of strategies for modulating the process of microbiota establishment in preterm infants. For successfully developing of such strategies, a detailed knowledge of the microbiota establishment process in these infants is needed. In a previous study we evidenced clear alterations in the process of microbiota establishment in preterm newborns when compared with a control group of full-term breast-fed infants. Here we have analyzed these data more in depth, corroborating a reduced proportion of strict anaerobes with respect to facultatives in the fecal microbiota of preterm infants. The potential benefits, as well as the side effects, of strategies aimed at counterbalancing this alteration in the facultative to strict anaerobes ratio are discussed in this addendum.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/gmic.21942

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anaerobic microorganisms, including Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides and Clostridium, establish gradually and contribute to a progressive decrease of the facultative anaerobes to strict anaerobes ratio in time.

    “Anaerobic microorganisms, including Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides and Clostridium establish gradually, and contribute to a progressive decrease of the facultative anaerobes to strict anaerobes ratio in time [7] .”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 74

Authors
Arboleya, S., Solís, G., Fernández, N., de los Reyes-Gavilán, C. G., & Gueimonde, M.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Hospital Universitario De Cabueñes (ES)
Corresponding author
Gueimonde, Miguel
Venue
Gut Microbes
Published
2012-11-16
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
583-588
ISSN
  • 1949-0976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-0984
OpenAlex
W2029061313
Cited by
74
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gut Microbes (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
preterm infants, gut microbiota, facultative anaerobes, obligate anaerobes, fecal microbiota, breast-fed infants, term infants
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Anaerobic, Feces, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Gastrointestinal Tract, Metagenome, Biota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review