Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 737

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The immunogenicity of humanized and fully human antibodies: Residual immunogenicity resides in the CDR regions

Open access
Harding, Fiona A., Stickler, Marcia M., Razo, Jennifer, DuBridge, Robert·2010·mAbs

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies represent an attractive therapeutic tool as they are highly specific for their targets, convey effector functions and enjoy robust manufacturing procedures. Humanization of murine monoclonal antibodies has vastly improved their in vivo tolerability. Humanization, the replacement of mouse constant regions and V framework regions for human sequences, results in a significantly less immunogenic product. However, some humanized and even fully human sequence-derived antibody molecules still carry immunological risk. To more fully understand the immunologic potential of humanized and human antibodies, we analyzed CD4(+) helper T cell epitopes in a set of eight humanized antibodies. The antibodies studied represented a number of different VH and VL family members carrying unique CDR regions. In spite of these differences, CD4(+) T cell epitopes were found only in CDR-sequence containing regions. We were able to incorporate up to two amino acid modifications in a single epitope that reduced the immunogenic potential while retaining full biologic function. We propose that immunogenicity will always be present in some antibody molecules due to the nature of the antigen-specific combining sites. A consequence of this result is modifications to reduce immunogenicity will be centered on the affinity-determining regions. Modifications to CDR regions can be designed that reduce the immunogenic potential while maintaining the bioactivity of the antibody molecule.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/mabs.2.3.11641

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 737

Metadata

Authors
Harding, F. A., Stickler, M. M., Razo, J., & DuBridge, R.
Venue
mAbs
Published
2010-05
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
256-265
ISSN
  • 1942-0862 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-0870
OpenAlex
W2147810684
Cited by
737
References
4
FWCI
14.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The immunogenicity of humanized and fully human antibodies: Residual immunogenicity resides in the CDR regions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4161/mabs.2.3.11641
The paper
Harding, F. A., Stickler, M. M., Razo, J., & DuBridge, R. (2010). The immunogenicity of humanized and fully human antibodies: Residual immunogenicity resides in the CDR regions. mAbs. https://doi.org/10.4161/mabs.2.3.11641

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.