The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Site-specific antibody drug conjugates for cancer therapy
Open accessAbstract
Antibody therapeutics have revolutionized the treatment of cancer over the past two decades. Antibodies that specifically bind tumor surface antigens can be effective therapeutics; however, many unmodified antibodies lack therapeutic activity. These antibodies can instead be applied successfully as guided missiles to deliver potent cytotoxic drugs in the form of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs). The success of ADCs is dependent on four factors--target antigen, antibody, linker, and payload. The field has made great progress in these areas, marked by the recent approval by the US Food and Drug Administration of two ADCs, brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla). However, the therapeutic window for many ADCs that are currently in pre-clinical or clinical development remains narrow and further improvements may be required to enhance the therapeutic potential of these ADCs. Production of ADCs is an area where improvement is needed because current methods yield heterogeneous mixtures that may include 0-8 drug species per antibody molecule. Site-specific conjugation has been recently shown to eliminate heterogeneity, improve conjugate stability, and increase the therapeutic window. Here, we review and describe various site-specific conjugation strategies that are currently used for the production of ADCs, including use of engineered cysteine residues, unnatural amino acids, and enzymatic conjugation through glycotransferases and transglutaminases. In addition, we also summarize differences among these methods and highlight critical considerations when building next-generation ADC therapeutics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
shRNA and siRNA delivery to the brain
Pardridge, W. M. (2007) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.03.008 · Cited by 176
Cited by
Strategies and challenges for the next generation of antibody–drug conjugates
Beck, A., Goetsch, L., Dumontet, C., & Corvaïa, N. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.268 · Cited by 2,271
Nanomedicine of synergistic drug combinations for cancer therapy – Strategies and perspectives
Zhang, R. X., Wong, H. L., Xue, H. Y., Eoh, J. Y., & Wu, X. Y. (2016) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.06.012 · Cited by 380
Going beyond the liver: progress and challenges of targeted delivery of siRNA therapeutics
Lorenzer, C., Dirin, M., Winkler, A.-M., Baumann, V., & Winkler, J. (2015) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.02.003 · Cited by 284
“Antibody-drug conjugates are attractive molecules for biomedicine development [157,158].”
BackgroundFekete, S., Guillarme, D., Sandra, P., & Sandra, K. (2016) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04561 · Cited by 258
Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) in cancer therapy: a nano-based approach
Mahmoodi Chalbatani, G., Dana, H., Gharagouzloo, E., Grijalvo, S., Eritja, R., Logsdon, C. D., Memari, F., Miri, S. R., Rezvani Rad, M., & Marmari, V. (2019) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s200253 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- Panowski, S., Bhakta, S., Raab, H., Polakis, P., & Junutula, J. R.
- Venue
- mAbs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-45
- ISSN
- 1942-0862 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-0870
- OpenAlex
- W2150244588
- Cited by
- 676
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Site-specific antibody drug conjugates for cancer therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4161/mabs.27022
- The paper
- Panowski, S., Bhakta, S., Raab, H., Polakis, P., & Junutula, J. R. (2014). Site-specific antibody drug conjugates for cancer therapy. mAbs. https://doi.org/10.4161/mabs.27022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.