Mechanical offloading of incisional wounds is associated with transcriptional downregulation of inflammatory pathways in a large animal model
Open accessAbstract
Cutaneous scarring is a major source of morbidity and current therapies to mitigate scar formation remain ineffective. Although wound fibrosis and inflammation are highly linked, only recently have mechanical forces been implicated in these pathways. Our group has developed a topical polymer device that significantly reduces post-injury scar formation via the manipulation of mechanical forces. Here we extend these studies to examine the genomewide transcriptional effects of mechanomodulation during scar formation using a validated large animal model, the red Duroc pig. We demonstrate that mechanical loading of incisional wounds upregulates expression of genes associated with inflammatory and fibrotic pathways, and that device-mediated offloading of these wounds reverses these effects. Validation studies are needed to clarify the clinical significance of these findings.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Intracellular fatty acid oxidation is downregulated in tubulointerstitial fibrosis in mice and humans, and its restoration is fibroprotective.
“Intracellular fatty acid oxidation is downregulated in tubulointerstitial fibrosis in mice and humans, and its restoration was fibroprotective56.”
From Fibrosis: from mechanisms to medicines (2020) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Januszyk, M., Wong, V. W., Bhatt, K. A., Vial, I. N., Paterno, J., Longaker, M. T., & Gurtner, G. C.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gurtner, Geoffrey C
- Venue
- Organogenesis
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 186-193
- ISSN
- 1547-6278 (ISSN-L)
- 1555-8592
- PMC
- PMC4154952
- OpenAlex
- W2049898064
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 1.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Organogenesis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH, W81XWH0820032)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (LM0077033)
- Armed Forces Institute of Regenerative Medicine
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Keywords
- incisional wounds, cutaneous scarring, scar formation, wound fibrosis, wound inflammation, inflammatory gene expression, large animal model, gene expression profiling
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Inflammation, Transcription, Genetic, Wound Healing, Wounds and Injuries, Signal Transduction, Down-Regulation, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Sus scrofa, Gene Regulatory Networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review