The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Abscisic Acid and Abiotic Stress Signaling
Open accessAbstract
Abiotic stress is severe environmental stress, which impairs crop production on irrigated land worldwide. Overall, the susceptibility or tolerance to the stress in plants is a coordinated action of multiple stress responsive genes, which also cross-talk with other components of stress signal transduction pathways. Plant responses to abiotic stress can be determined by the severity of the stress and by the metabolic status of the plant. Abscisic acid (ABA) is a phytohormone critical for plant growth and development and plays an important role in integrating various stress signals and controlling downstream stress responses. Plants have to adjust ABA levels constantly in responce to changing physiological and environmental conditions. To date, the mechanisms for fine-tuning of ABA levels remain elusive. The mechanisms by which plants respond to stress include both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent processes. Various transcription factors such as DREB2A/2B, AREB1, RD22BP1 and MYC/MYB are known to regulate the ABA-responsive gene expression through interacting with their corrosponding cis-acting elements such as DRE/CRT, ABRE and MYCRS/MYBRS, respectively. Understanding these mechanisms is important to improve stress tolerance in crops plants. This article first describes the general pathway for plant stress response followed by roles of ABA and transcription factors in stress tolerance including the regulation of ABA biosynthesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
S ALT AND D ROUGHT S TRESS S IGNAL T RANSDUCTION IN P LANTS
Zhu, J.-K. (2002) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.143329 · Cited by 5,835
PLANT COLD ACCLIMATION: Freezing Tolerance Genes and Regulatory Mechanisms
Thomashow, M. F. (1999) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.571 · Cited by 3,551
Cold, salinity and drought stresses: An overview
Mahajan, S., & Tuteja, N. (2005) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1016/j.abb.2005.10.018 · Cited by 2,925
Self-citationCell Signaling during Cold, Drought, and Salt Stress
Xiong, L., Schumaker, K. S., & Zhu, J.-K. (2002) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.000596 · Cited by 2,372
Shinozaki, K., & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2000) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(00)80068-0 · Cited by 1,628
Uno, Y., Furihata, T., Abe, H., Yoshida, R., Shinozaki, K., & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.190309197 · Cited by 1,365
Molecular genetic perspectives on cross-talk and specificity in abiotic stress signalling in plants
Chinnusamy, V. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erh005 · Cited by 1,127
Calcium signalling in Arabidopsis thaliana responding to drought and salinity
Knight, H., Trewavas, A. J., & Knight, M. R. (1997) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.12051067.x · Cited by 915
Reyes, J. L., & Chua, N. (2007) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02980.x · Cited by 824
Lee, K. H., Piao, H. L., Kim, H.-Y., Choi, S. M., Jiang, F., Hartung, W., Hwang, I., Kwak, J. M., Lee, I.-J., & Hwang, I. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.034 · Cited by 690
Zhong, R., Kays, S. J., Schroeder, B. P., & Ye, Z.-H. (2002) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.010278 · Cited by 641
Xiong, L., Ishitani, M., Lee, H., & Zhu, J.-K. (2001) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.010101 · Cited by 552
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (1993) · Molecular and General Genetics MGG · doi:10.1007/bf00277130 · Cited by 551
Xiong, L. (2001) · THE PLANT CELL ONLINE · doi:10.1105/tpc.13.9.2063 · Cited by 454
Sanan-Mishra, N., Pham, X. H., Sopory, S. K., & Tuteja, N. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0406485102 · Cited by 222
Self-citationNakashima, K., Kiyosue, T., Yamaguchi‐Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (1997) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.12040851.x · Cited by 211
Verslues, P. E., Kim, Y., & Zhu, J. (2007) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-007-9145-z · Cited by 154
Cloning and characterization of CBL‐CIPK signalling components from a legume (Pisum sativum)
Mahajan, S., Sopory, S. K., & Tuteja, N. K. (2006) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05111.x · Cited by 110
Self-citationKim, J.-B., Kang, J., & Kim, S. Y. (2004) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2004.00090.x · Cited by 101
Phospholipase D Is a Negative Regulator of Proline Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana
Thiery, L., Leprince, A., Lefebvre, D., Ghars, M. A., Debarbieux, E., & Savouré, A. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m308456200 · Cited by 99
Cited by
Vishwakarma, K., Upadhyay, N., Kumar, N., Yadav, G., Singh, J., Mishra, R. K., Kumar, V., Verma, R., Upadhyay, R. G., Pandey, M., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00161 · Cited by 1,116
The role of ABA and MAPK signaling pathways in plant abiotic stress responses
Danquah, A., de Zelicourt, A., Colcombet, J., & Hirt, H. (2014) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.09.006 · Cited by 755
Pandey, P., Ramegowda, V., & Senthil-Kumar, M. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00723 · Cited by 572
In Posidonia oceanica cadmium induces changes in DNA methylation and chromatin patterning
Greco, M., Chiappetta, A., Bruno, L., & Bitonti, M. B. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err313 · Cited by 538
Yu, Z.-X., Li, J.-X., Yang, C.-Q., Hu, W.-L., Wang, L.-J., & Chen, X.-Y. (2012) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1093/mp/ssr087 · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Authors
- Tuteja, N.
- Venue
- Plant Signaling & Behavior
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 135-138
- ISSN
- 1559-2316 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-2324
- OpenAlex
- W2021482850
- Cited by
- 867
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.