Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 337

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fusion categories and homotopy theory

Open access
Etingof, Pavel, Nikshych, Dmitri, Ostrik, Victor·2010·Quantum Topology

Abstract

We apply the yoga of classical homotopy theory to classification problems of G -extensions of fusion and braided fusion categories, where G is a finite group. Namely, we reduce such problems to classification (up to homotopy) of maps from BG to classifying spaces of certain higher groupoids. In particular, to every fusion category \mathcal C we attach the 3-groupoid \underline{\underline{\mathrm{BrPic}}}(\mathcal C) of invertible \mathcal C -bimodule categories, called the Brauer–Picard groupoid of \mathcal C , such that equivalence classes of G -extensions of \mathcal C are in bijection with homotopy classes of maps from BG to the classifying space of \underline{\underline{\mathrm{BrPic}}}(\mathcal C) . This gives rise to an explicit description of both the obstructions to existence of extensions and the data parametrizing them; we work these out both topologically and algebraically. One of the central results of the article is that the 2-truncation of \underline{\underline{\mathrm{BrPic}}}(\mathcal C) is canonically equivalent to the 2-groupoid of braided auto-equivalences of the Drinfeld center \mathcal Z(\mathcal C) of \mathcal C . In particular, this implies that the Brauer–Picard group \mathrm{BrPic}(\mathcal C) (i.e., the group of equivalence classes of invertible \mathcal C -bimodule categories) is naturally isomorphic to the group of braided auto-equivalences of \mathcal Z(\mathcal C) . Thus, if \mathcal C = \mathrm{Vec}_A , where A is a finite abelian group, then \mathrm{BrPic}(\mathcal C) is the orthogonal group \mathrm{O}(A \oplus A^*) . This allows one to obtain a rather explicit classification of extensions in this case; in particular, in the case G = \mathbb Z_2 , we re-derive (without computations) the classical result of Tambara and Yamagami. Moreover, we explicitly describe the category of all (\mathrm{Vec}_{A_1},\mathrm{Vec}_{A_2}) -bimodule categories (not necessarily invertible ones) by showing that it is equivalent to the hyperbolic part of the category of Lagrangian correspondences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4171/qt/6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 337

Metadata

Authors
Etingof, P., Nikshych, D., & Ostrik, V.
Venue
Quantum Topology
Published
2010-08-19
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
209-273
ISSN
  • 1663-487X (ISSN-L)
  • 1664-073X
OpenAlex
W2116217505
Cited by
337
References
1
FWCI
13.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fusion categories and homotopy theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4171/qt/6
The paper
Etingof, P., Nikshych, D., & Ostrik, V. (2010). Fusion categories and homotopy theory. Quantum Topology. https://doi.org/10.4171/qt/6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.