The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fusion categories and homotopy theory
Open accessAbstract
We apply the yoga of classical homotopy theory to classification problems of G -extensions of fusion and braided fusion categories, where G is a finite group. Namely, we reduce such problems to classification (up to homotopy) of maps from BG to classifying spaces of certain higher groupoids. In particular, to every fusion category \mathcal C we attach the 3-groupoid \underline{\underline{\mathrm{BrPic}}}(\mathcal C) of invertible \mathcal C -bimodule categories, called the Brauer–Picard groupoid of \mathcal C , such that equivalence classes of G -extensions of \mathcal C are in bijection with homotopy classes of maps from BG to the classifying space of \underline{\underline{\mathrm{BrPic}}}(\mathcal C) . This gives rise to an explicit description of both the obstructions to existence of extensions and the data parametrizing them; we work these out both topologically and algebraically. One of the central results of the article is that the 2-truncation of \underline{\underline{\mathrm{BrPic}}}(\mathcal C) is canonically equivalent to the 2-groupoid of braided auto-equivalences of the Drinfeld center \mathcal Z(\mathcal C) of \mathcal C . In particular, this implies that the Brauer–Picard group \mathrm{BrPic}(\mathcal C) (i.e., the group of equivalence classes of invertible \mathcal C -bimodule categories) is naturally isomorphic to the group of braided auto-equivalences of \mathcal Z(\mathcal C) . Thus, if \mathcal C = \mathrm{Vec}_A , where A is a finite abelian group, then \mathrm{BrPic}(\mathcal C) is the orthogonal group \mathrm{O}(A \oplus A^*) . This allows one to obtain a rather explicit classification of extensions in this case; in particular, in the case G = \mathbb Z_2 , we re-derive (without computations) the classical result of Tambara and Yamagami. Moreover, we explicitly describe the category of all (\mathrm{Vec}_{A_1},\mathrm{Vec}_{A_2}) -bimodule categories (not necessarily invertible ones) by showing that it is equivalent to the hyperbolic part of the category of Lagrangian correspondences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lectures on Tensor Categories and Modular Functors
Bakalov, B., & Kirillov, A. (2000) · University Lecture Series · doi:10.1090/ulect/021 · Cited by 780
Cited by
Majorana zero modes and topological quantum computation
Sarma, S. D., Freedman, M., & Nayak, C. (2015) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/npjqi.2015.1 · Cited by 1,180
Symmetry fractionalization, defects, and gauging of topological phases
Barkeshli, M., Bonderson, P., Cheng, M., & Wang, Z. (2019) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.115147 · Cited by 533
Exploring 2-group global symmetries
Córdova, C., Dumitrescu, T. T., & Intriligator, K. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2019)184 · Cited by 348
Fidkowski, L., Chen, X., & Vishwanath, A. (2013) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.3.041016 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Etingof, P., Nikshych, D., & Ostrik, V.
- Venue
- Quantum Topology
- Published
- 2010-08-19
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 209-273
- ISSN
- 1663-487X (ISSN-L)
- 1664-073X
- DOI
- 10.4171/qt/6
- OpenAlex
- W2116217505
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fusion categories and homotopy theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4171/qt/6
- The paper
- Etingof, P., Nikshych, D., & Ostrik, V. (2010). Fusion categories and homotopy theory. Quantum Topology. https://doi.org/10.4171/qt/6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.