The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development of a Pre- and Postnatal Bonding Scale (PPBS)
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Bonding is a major topic in the field of developmental psychology, due to its importance in adequate childhood development. Studies investigating the relationship between pre- and postnatal bonding show moderate correlations. However, an important limitation is that no similar instruments were used to measure bonding pre- and post-natally. In the current study, a user-friendly questionnaire has been developed to assess maternal bonding during pregnancy and postpartum. Psychometric properties were also investigated. Methods: In a large unselected sample of 1050 pregnant women, 14 positive items, based on the literature, were used to construct a pre- and postnatal bonding scale (PPBS) questionnaire. The sample was randomly split into two equal sub-samples: group I was used for reliability and Exploratory Factor Analysis; group II for Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The bonding scale was assessed at 32 weeks pregnancy and at eight and 12 months postpartum. The Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) and the subscale Partner Involvement of the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale (TPDS) were used to assess concurrent validity. Results: After CFA, a five-item bonding scale remained with excellent model fit (CFI: 0.97, TLI: 0.97, NFI: 0.98; RMSEA: 0.06 lower bound 0.03. Cronbach’s alpha’s at 32 weeks gestation and at eight and 12 months' postpartum were: 0.87, 0.80 and 0.79, respectively. Test-retest correlations of the PPBS at 32 weeks gestation and at eight and 12 months post…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Witteveen, A. B., Henrichs, J., Walker, A. L., Bohlmeijer, E. T., Burger, H., Fontein-Kuipers, Y., Schellevis, F. G., Stramrood, C. A. I., Olff, M., Verhoeven, C. J., et al. (2020) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03395-9 · Cited by 13
de Waal, N., Lodder, P., Nyklíček, I., Hulsbosch, L. P., van den Heuvel, M. I., van der Gucht, K., de Caluwé, E., Pop, V. J. M., & Boekhorst, M. G. B. M. (2024) · Early Human Development · doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106082 · Cited by 10
Self-citationde Waal, N., Nyklíček, I., van der Gucht, K., Pop, V. J. M., & Boekhorst, M. G. B. M. (2025) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-024-02968-y · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- I, C., Wetering AP, V. D., ES, P., SEM, T., Baar AL, V., & VJM, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy
- Publisher
- OMICS Publishing Group
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 2161-0487 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2549649091
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dspace.library.uu.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Keywords
- maternal bonding, prenatal bonding, postpartum bonding, scale development, psychometric properties, pregnancy, postpartum depression, partner support, pregnancy distress, self-report questionnaire
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review