Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Relation between Perceived Effort and the Electromyographic Signal in Localized Effort Activities of Forearm Muscles

Korol, Gadi, Karniel, Amir, Melzer, Itzik, Ronen, Adi, Edan, Yael, Stern, Helman, Riemer, Raziel·2017·Journal of Ergonomics

Abstract

To understand the factors that determines human perception of effort. This study investigated the relationship between objective measures of exertion (handgrip force and electromyography – EMG) and perceived effort (Borg scale) during localized activities of the forearm muscles. This relation is important for understanding the factors that determine human perception of effort. Method: Two hand-gesture experiments (low effort) and one handgrip force experiment (moderate to high effort) were carried out. During the experiments, Borg ratings, grip forces and EMG signals from six forearm muscles were obtained. The relationship between objective measurements and perceived effort were investigated using generalized linear mixed models. Results: The linear models for predicting the Borg ratings based on gender and EMG provided R-squared values of up to 0.5 for generic models and up to 0.85 when fitting a model to individual subjects. In addition, the model based on the average EMG of all recorded muscles was found to as good as a model based on individual muscles. The results indicated that women rated low-effort activities as less being effortful than men, while there was no difference between genders for moderate- to high-effort activity. Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrated that muscle activation level (i.e. EMG) is related to perceived effort for localized hand effort tasks and can explain a large part of an individual’s perceived effort. The results suggest that…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4172/2165-7556.1000.s6-004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Humans can perceive their localized effort, which can be reflected in electromyographic recordings.

    “and their localized effort, which can be reflected in electromyographic recordings (Korol et al., 2014(Korol et al., , 2017)).”

    From Preferred walking speed on rough terrain: is it all about energetics? (2019) · cites this paper as Korol et al., 2017

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Korol, G., Karniel, A., Melzer, I., Ronen, A., Edan, Y., Stern, H., & Riemer, R.
Venue
Journal of Ergonomics
Published
2017
Volume
07
Issue
S6
ISSN
2165-7556
Cited by
3
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review