Refractory hypothyroidism to levothyroxine treatment: five cases of pseudomalabsorption
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: A persistently elevated thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level is a common clinical problem in primary hypothyroidism patients treated with levothyroxine (LT4). "Pseudomalabsorption", which is characterized by poor adherence,should be considered in cases of refractory hypothyroidism after excluding other causes, such as malabsorption. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed the features of the patients with persistently elevated TSH despite high-dose LT4 therapy. DESIGN: Symptom evaluation, medications, comorbid diseases and physical examination features of five patients who applied to our outpatient clinic between 2016-2019 and diagnosed with LT4 pseudomalabsorption were retrospectively analyzed. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The LT4 loading test was performed with an oral dose of 1,000 µg LT4. Demographic parameters, BMI, thyroid function tests, laboratory parameters for malabsorption were recorded. RESULTS: We observed at least two-fold increase of free thyroxine levels during the test, which was considered pseudomalabsorption. Euthyroidism was achieved in two patients by increasing the LT4 dosage and in one patient with a change in the preparation. TSH decreased significantly after being informed about compliance in one patient. Another one was given LT4 twice weekly, but TSH remained elevated because of nonadherence. CONCLUSION: The LT4 loading/absorption test is a valuable tool to confirm the diagnosis of pseudomalabsorption. Informing patients, changing the preparation, increasing the dose, supervised intake of daily/weekly LT4 forms are treatment options for managing these cases.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The increase in FT4 levels compared with baseline also indicates absorption ability, although the threshold value ranges from 50% to 250% in different studies.
“The increase in FT4 levels compared with baseline also indicates the absorption ability, although the threshold value ranges from 50% to 250% in different studies (132, 133).”
From Levothyroxine: conventional and novel drug delivery formulations. (2023) · cites this paper as [133]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 7
- Authors
- Elbasan, O.
- Affiliations
- Marmara University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Elbasan, O
- ORCID
- Elbasan, O
- Venue
- Acta Endocrinologica (Bucharest)
- Publisher
- ACTA Endocrinologica Foundation
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 339-345
- ISSN
- 1841-0987 (ISSN-L)
- 1843-066X
- PMC
- PMC7748222
- OpenAlex
- W3111440167
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Acta Endocrinologica (Bucharest) (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Dspace Repository (Marmara Üniversitesi) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Keywords
- refractory hypothyroidism, levothyroxine, TSH elevation, medication adherence, free thyroxine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review