Cited by 26Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchCardiovascular and exercise physiologyRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Asynchronous Thoraco-abdominal Motion Contributes to Decreased 6-Minute Walk Test in Patients With COPD

Chien, Jung-Yien, Ruan, Sheng-Yuan, Huang, Yuh-Chin T, Yu, Chong-Jen, Yang, Pan-Chyr·2013·Respiratory Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abnormal thoraco-abdominal motion may contribute to exercise limitation in patients with COPD. The current study aimed to assess how the thoraco-abdominal asynchrony in COPD patients correlates with exercise performance during the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). METHODS: Eighty-eight COPD subjects (40 moderate and 48 severe) and 14 healthy controls were evaluated at rest and during the 6MWT for the magnitude of rib cage and abdominal motion and asynchrony between the two (phase angle) with respiratory inductive plethysmography. RESULTS: Compared to healthy control subjects, subjects with COPD had similar magnitude of rib cage and abdominal motion, but greater asynchrony at rest. During the 6MWT, subjects with COPD showed decreased rib cage motion and increased asynchrony. Rib cage excursion at 3 min after the beginning of the 6MWT was an independent predictor for the 6MWT distance ( P < .001), in addition to age, percent of predicted FEV 1 , and residual volume/total lung capacity. There was no correlation between rib cage excursion at 3 min and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score. CONCLUSIONS: Thoraco-abdominal asynchrony worsens early during 6MWT in subjects with moderate and severe COPD, and rib cage excursion at 3 min predicts poor walking capability. A pulmonary rehabilitation strategy devised to improve rib cage excursion may help improve exercise tolerance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4187/respcare.01522

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chien, J.-Y., Ruan, S.-Y., Huang, Y.-C. T., Yu, C.-J., & Yang, P.-C.
Affiliations
  • Ministry of Health and Welfare (TW)
  • National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Venue
Respiratory Care
Published
2012-07-12
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
320-326
ISSN
0020-1324 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2181942386
Cited by
26
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Respiratory Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 6-minute walk test, exercise tolerance, abdominal motion, respiratory inductance plethysmography, phase angle, pulmonary rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Abdomen, Age Factors, Aged, Exercise Test, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Movement, Plethysmography, Surveys and Questionnaires, Residual Volume, Respiration, Rest, Severity of Illness Index, Thorax, Case-Control Studies, Walking, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review