Cited by 33Sinusitis and nasal conditionsComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesHerbal Medicine Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cyclamen europaeum nasal spray, a novel phytotherapeutic product for the management of acute rhinosinusitis: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Open access
Pfaar, O., Mullol, J., Anders, C., Hörmann, K., Klimek, L.·2012·Rhinology journal

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a phytotherapeutic nasal spray containing Cyclamen europaeum (CE) in the treatment of acute rhinosinusitis (ARS). MATERIAL/METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of CE nasal spray once daily for 15 days in 99 adult patients with moderate-to-severe ARS who also received amoxicillin 500 mg three times daily for the first 8 days. The primary endpoint was the change in mean total symptom scores (TSS) on day 7. Secondary endpoints included individual symptom scores (nasal congestion, mucus secretion, facial pain, impairment of smell) and endoscopic findings on days 7 and 15 and others. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in TSS was noted for CE versus placebo on day 7. Moreover, the individual scores were not statistically different between the groups for the ITT-population on day 7. However, both a reduction in facial pain and an improvement in endoscopically-assessed mucosal obstruction significantly favoured CE on day 7. The most common adverse events were nasal burning and mild epistaxis, but no severe adverse events were documented. CONCLUSION: In summary, this is the first randomized controlled trial on phytotherapy in patients with moderate-to-severe ARS demonstrating clinical safety and some encouraging effects of CE which merit to investigate phytotherapeutic products in further large-scale clinical trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4193/rhino10.096

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Anand VK. Epidemiology and economic impact of rhinosinusitis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. May 2004; 193: 3-5.
  2. Lund VJ. Therapeutic targets in rhinosinusi- tis: infection or inflammation? Medscape J Med. 2008; 10: 105.
  3. Scadding GK, Durham SR, Mirakian R, et al. BSACI guidelines for the management of rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008; 38: 260-275.
  4. Fokkens W, Lund V, Mullol J. EP3OS 2007: European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2007. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists. Rhinology. 2007; 45: 97-101.
  5. Klossek JM, Federspil P. Update on treatment guidelines for acute bacterial sinusitis. Int J Clin Pract. 2005; 59: 230-238.
  6. Marple BF, Brunton S, Ferguson BJ. Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis: a review of U.S. treat- ment guidelines. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 135: 341-348.
  7. Bhattacharyya N. Contemporary assessment of the disease burden of sinusitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009; 23: 392-395.
  8. Bachert C, Hormann K, Mosges R, et al. An update on the diagnosis and treatment of sinusitis and nasal polyposis. Allergy. 2003; 58: 176-191.
  9. Fokkens W, Lund V, Bachert C, et al. EAACI position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps executive summary. Allergy. 2005; 60: 583-601.
  10. Macdonald KI, McNally JD, Massoud E. The health and resource utilization of Canadians with chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2009; 119: 184-189.
  11. Watelet JB, Eloy PH, van Cauwenberge PB. Drug management in chronic rhinosinusitis: identification of the needs. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007; 3: 47-57.
  12. Ashworth M, Charlton J, Ballard K, Latinovic R, Gulliford M. Variations in antibiotic pre- scribing and consultation rates for acute respiratory infection in UK general practices 1995-2000. Br J Gen Pract. 2005; 55: 603-608.
  13. Small CB, Bachert C, Lund VJ, Moscatello A, Nayak AS, Berger WE. Judicious antibiotic use and intranasal corticosteroids in acute rhinosinusitis. Am J Med. 2007; 120: 289-294.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pfaar, O., Mullol, J., Anders, C., Hörmann, K., & Klimek, L.
Affiliations
  • Zentrum für Rhinologie und Allergologie (DE)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • University Medical Centre Mannheim (DE)
Venue
Rhinology journal
Published
2012-03-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
37-44
ISSN
0300-0729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W17026572
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Rhinology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Herbal Medicine Research Studies
Keywords
herbal medicine, nasal spray, acute sinusitis, amoxicillin, symptom scores, facial pain, nasal congestion, adverse events
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Phytotherapy, Middle Aged, Rhinitis, Sinusitis, Plant Preparations, Cyclamen, Young Adult, Nasal Sprays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review