New Palaeoscolecidan Worms from the Lower Cambrian: Sirius Passet, Latham Shale and Kinzers Shale
Open accessAbstract
Palaeoscolecidan worms are an important component of many Lower Palaeozoic marine assemblages, with notable occurrences in a number of Burgess Shale-type Fossil-Lagersttten. In addition to material from the lower Cambrian Kinzers Formation and Latham Shale, we also describe two new palaeoscolecidan taxa from the lower Cambrian Sirius Passet Fossil-Lagersttte of North Greenland: Chalazoscolex pharkus gen. et sp. nov and Xystoscolex boreogyrus gen. et sp. nov. These palaeoscolecidans appear to be the oldest known (Cambrian Series 2, Stage 3) soft-bodied examples, being somewhat older than the diverse assemblages from the Chengjiang Fossil-Lagersttte of China. In the Sirius Passet taxa the body is composed of a spinose introvert (or proboscis), trunk with ornamentation that includes regions bearing cuticular ridges and sclerites, and a caudal zone with prominent circles of sclerites. The taxa are evidently quite closely related; generic differentiation is based on degree of trunk ornamentation, details of introvert structure and nature of the caudal region. The worms were probably infaunal or semi-epifaunal; gut contents suggest that at least X. boreogyrus may have preyed on the arthropod Isoxys.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A fragment of an articulated body covered with cambroclavid-type sclerites was reported from the Sirius Passet fauna and has been tentatively assigned to the Ecdysozoa.
“A fragment of an articulated body covered with cambroclavid-type sclerites was reported from the Sirius Passet fauna and has been tentatively assigned to the Ecdysozoa”
From Chronology of early Cambrian biomineralization (2012) · cites this paper as Conway Morris & Peel, 2010
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 76 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Morris, S. C., & Peel, J. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Uppsala University (SE)
- ORCID
- Peel, John S.
- Venue
- Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
- Publisher
- Polska Akademia Nauk Instytut Paleobiologii (Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences)
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 141-156
- ISSN
- 0567-7920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049746512
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Acta Palaeontologica Polonica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Funders
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge
- Uppsala Universitet
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- new genus and species, Lower Cambrian, soft-bodied fossils, proboscis, cuticular ridges, sclerites, gut contents, Cambrian Series 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review