Cited by 67Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology Studies

New Palaeoscolecidan Worms from the Lower Cambrian: Sirius Passet, Latham Shale and Kinzers Shale

Open access
Morris, Simon Conway, Peel, John S.·2010·Acta Palaeontologica Polonica

Abstract

Palaeoscolecidan worms are an important component of many Lower Palaeozoic marine assemblages, with notable occurrences in a number of Burgess Shale-type Fossil-Lagersttten. In addition to material from the lower Cambrian Kinzers Formation and Latham Shale, we also describe two new palaeoscolecidan taxa from the lower Cambrian Sirius Passet Fossil-Lagersttte of North Greenland: Chalazoscolex pharkus gen. et sp. nov and Xystoscolex boreogyrus gen. et sp. nov. These palaeoscolecidans appear to be the oldest known (Cambrian Series 2, Stage 3) soft-bodied examples, being somewhat older than the diverse assemblages from the Chengjiang Fossil-Lagersttte of China. In the Sirius Passet taxa the body is composed of a spinose introvert (or proboscis), trunk with ornamentation that includes regions bearing cuticular ridges and sclerites, and a caudal zone with prominent circles of sclerites. The taxa are evidently quite closely related; generic differentiation is based on degree of trunk ornamentation, details of introvert structure and nature of the caudal region. The worms were probably infaunal or semi-epifaunal; gut contents suggest that at least X. boreogyrus may have preyed on the arthropod Isoxys.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4202/app.2009.0058

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A fragment of an articulated body covered with cambroclavid-type sclerites was reported from the Sirius Passet fauna and has been tentatively assigned to the Ecdysozoa.

    “A fragment of an articulated body covered with cambroclavid-type sclerites was reported from the Sirius Passet fauna and has been tentatively assigned to the Ecdysozoa”

    From Chronology of early Cambrian biomineralization (2012) · cites this paper as Conway Morris & Peel, 2010

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 76 · Cited by 67

Authors
Morris, S. C., & Peel, J. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
Published
2010-03
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
141-156
ISSN
0567-7920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049746512
Cited by
67
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Acta Palaeontologica Polonica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge
  • Uppsala Universitet
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
new genus and species, Lower Cambrian, soft-bodied fossils, proboscis, cuticular ridges, sclerites, gut contents, Cambrian Series 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review