The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Formalizing IMO Problems and Solutions in Isabelle/HOL
Open accessAbstract
The International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) is perhaps the most celebrated mental competition in the world and as such is among the greatest grand challenges for Artificial Intelligence (AI). The IMO Grand Challenge, recently formulated, requires to build an AI that can win a gold medal in the competition. We present some initial steps that could help to tackle this goal by creating a public repository of mechanically checked solutions of IMO Problems in the interactive theorem prover Isabelle/HOL. This repository is actively maintained by students of the Faculty of Mathematics, University of Belgrade, Serbia within the course "Introduction to Interactive Theorem Proving".
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The problem is even worse for geometry because of its unique translation challenges1,5, resulting in severe scarcity of training data.”
From Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Djuki\'c, 2011, The IMO compendium, 10.1007/978-1-4419-9854-5 · DOI
- Eberl, 2019, Selected Problems from the International Mathematical Olympiad 2019, Archive of Formal Proofs
- Génevaux, 2011, Formalization of Wu's Simple Method in Coq, 71, 10.1007/978-3-642-25379-9_8 · DOI
- Janiči\'c, 2012, The Area Method: a Recapitulation, Journal of Automated Reasoning, 48, 489, 10.1007/s10817-010-9209-7 · DOI
- Nipkow, 2020 (accessed Jun 20, 2020), Programming and Proving in Isabelle/HOL
- Pham, 2011, A Coq-Based Library for Interactive and Automated Theorem Proving in Plane Geometry, 368, 10.1007/978-3-642-21898-9_32 · DOI
- Stojanovi\'c-\begingroupłet [Pleaseinsert\PrerenderUnicodeÐintopreamble]ur\IeCđ evi\'c, 2019, From informal to formal proofs in Euclidean geometry, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 85, 10.1007/s10472-018-9597-7 · DOI
- Wiedijk, 2006, The Seventeen Provers of the World: Foreword by Dana S. Scott (Lecture Notes in Computer Science / Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence), 10.1007/s11225-007-9093-2 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations
Trinh, T. H., Wu, Y., Le, Q. V., He, H., & Luong, T. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06747-5 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Marić, F., & Stojanović-Đurđević, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Belgrade (RS)
- Venue
- Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
- Publisher
- Open Publishing Association
- Published
- 2020-10-30
- Volume
- 328
- Pages
- 35-55
- ISSN
- 2075-2180 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3095074845
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Logic, programming, and type systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Formal Methods in Verification
- Keywords
- International Mathematical Olympiad, interactive theorem proving, Isabelle/HOL
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formalizing IMO Problems and Solutions in Isabelle/HOL. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4204/eptcs.328.3
- The paper
- Marić, F., & Stojanović-Đurđević, S. (2020). Formalizing IMO Problems and Solutions in Isabelle/HOL. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.328.3