Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Method for the Automated Discovery of Angle Theorems

Open access
Todd, Philip·2021·Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science

Abstract

The Naive Angle Method, used by Geometry Expressions for solving problems which involve only angle constraints, represents a geometrical configuration as a sparse linear system. Linear systems with the same underlying matrix structure underpin a number of different geometrical theorems. We use a graph theoretical approach to define a generalization of the matrix structure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4204/eptcs.352.17

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 : Figure 1: Two theorems which share the same matrix
Figure 1 : Figure 1: Two theorems which share the same matrixCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 2 : Figure 2: Two theorems whose matrices have non-zero elements in the same locations, but which are not identical
Figure 2 : Figure 2: Two theorems whose matrices have non-zero elements in the same locations, but which are not identicalCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 4 : Figure 4: A Theorem Corresponding to a generated matrix. ABC is a triangle E and D lie on sides BC and AC such that ABED is cyclic. G is on AC such that |AB| = |BG|. H is the intersection of BG and DE. Then C, E, H, G are cyclic.
Figure 4 : Figure 4: A Theorem Corresponding to a generated matrix. ABC is a triangle E and D lie on sides BC and AC such that ABED is cyclic. G is on AC such that |AB| = |BG|. H is the intersection of BG and DE. Then C, E, H, G are cyclic.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1007/978-3-319-99956-2-15 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99956-2-15
  2. 10.1007/978-3-319-99956-2_10 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99956-2_10

Cited by

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Todd, P.
Affiliations
Saltire Software (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Todd, Philip
Venue
Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
Published
2021-12-30
Volume
352
Pages
148-155
ISSN
2075-2180 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200017213
Cited by
3
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Mathematics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Polynomial and algebraic computation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Keywords
geometry theorem proving, sparse linear systems, graph theory, angle constraints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Method for the Automated Discovery of Angle Theorems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4204/eptcs.352.17
The paper
Todd, P. (2021). A Method for the Automated Discovery of Angle Theorems. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.352.17

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.