Cited by 23Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsIndoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Water-soluble Ions in PM2.5 on the Qianhu Campus of Nanchang University, Nanchang City: Indoor-Outdoor Distribution and Source Implications

Open access

Abstract

Ambient PM2.5 was sampled in three indoor environments (a common office, a photocopy room and a student dormitory) and one outdoor environment (a rooftop) on a campus of Nanchang University in Nanchang city, China, on June 5–20, 2009. Analysis by ion chromatograph showed the indoor-outdoor differences and relationships of water-soluble ions. The indoor-outdoor distributions indicated that chemicals and household garbage contributed most to the generation of water-soluble ions indoors. The indoor-outdoor relationships of water-soluble ions in PM2.5 in the common office and student dormitory were unrelated or weak, which indicated that the ions were produced indoors rather than carried in from outdoors. Correlations between various water-soluble ions in indoor and outdoor PM2.5 are discussed here, and it is suggested that the photocopier machine contributed little to the water-soluble ions indoors. Ion balance calculations indicated that the anions and cations in the photocopy room and outdoor environment shared an origin, but part of the anions and cations in the common office room and student dormitory originated indoors. The linear regression slopes (anion/cation) are all lower than 1, with the anion deficits probably affected by the absence of data on F−, PO43−, NO2−, CO32− and organic acid salt.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4209/aaqr.2011.11.0219

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anion deficits are affected by the absence of data on F-, PO4 3-, NO2-, and organic acid salts, in addition to the contribution of carbonates in some samples.

    “In addition to the contribution of carbonates in some samples, the anion deficits are thought to have been affected by the absence of data on F -, PO 4 3-, NO 2 -, and organic acid salts (Huang et al., 2012).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Huang, H., Zou, C., Cao, J., Tsang, P., Zhu, F., Yu, C., & Xue, S.
Affiliations
  • Nanchang University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Published
2012
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
435-443
ISSN
  • 1680-8584 (ISSN-L)
  • 2071-1409
OpenAlex
W2129814064
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-sa
Locations
Aerosol and Air Quality Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
PM2.5, water-soluble ions, indoor air quality, ion homeostasis, source apportionment, household waste, student dormitory, office environment, Nanchang

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review