The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Survey of Machine Learning Algorithms for Disease Diagnostic
Open accessAbstract
In medical imaging, Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) is a rapidly growing dynamic area of research. In recent years, significant attempts are made for the enhancement of computer aided diagnosis applications because errors in medical diagnostic systems can result in seriously misleading medical treatments. Machine learning is important in Computer Aided Diagnosis. After using an easy equation, objects such as organs may not be indicated accurately. So, pattern recognition fundamentally involves learning from examples. In the field of bio-medical, pattern recognition and machine learning promise the improved accuracy of perception and diagnosis of disease. They also promote the objectivity of decision-making process. For the analysis of high-dimensional and multimodal bio-medical data, machine learning offers a worthy approach for making classy and automatic algorithms. This survey paper provides the comparative analysis of different machine learning algorithms for diagnosis of different diseases such as heart disease, diabetes disease, liver disease, dengue disease and hepatitis disease. It brings attention towards the suite of machine learning algorithms and tools that are used for the analysis of diseases and decision-making process accordingly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Machine learning can help to solve diagnostic and prognostic problems in a variety of medical domains, such as disease prediction, medical knowledge extraction, detecting regularities in data, patient management, etc. [33, 77, 112].”
From Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions (2021) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions
Sarker, I. H. (2021) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x · Cited by 5,583
Heart Disease Prediction using Machine Learning Techniques
Shah, D., Patel, S., & Bharti, S. K. (2020) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-020-00365-y · Cited by 658
MLCM: Multi-Label Confusion Matrix
(2022) · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3151048 · Cited by 447
Machine learning and deep learning approach for medical image analysis: diagnosis to detection
Rana, M., & Bhushan, M. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-022-14305-w · Cited by 365
Reinforcement learning for intelligent healthcare applications: A survey
Coronato, A., Naeem, M., De Pietro, G., & Paragliola, G. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101964 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Fatima, M., & Pasha, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications
- Publisher
- Scientific Research Publishing, Inc.
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 09
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 2150-8402 (ISSN-L)
- 2150-8410
- OpenAlex
- W2581465409
- Cited by
- 627
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 59.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survey of Machine Learning Algorithms for Disease Diagnostic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4236/jilsa.2017.91001
- The paper
- Fatima, M., & Pasha, M. (2017). Survey of Machine Learning Algorithms for Disease Diagnostic. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications. https://doi.org/10.4236/jilsa.2017.91001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.