Cited by 5Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and InhibitionGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchGeological and Geochemical Analysis

Influence of Mg2+, Fe2+ and Zn2+ Cations on 13C-18O Bonds in Precipitated Aragonite, Calcite and Dolomite: An ab Initio Study

Open access
Yuan, Jie·2015·Open Journal of Geology

Abstract

The influence of metal cations on 13C-18O bonds in carbonates is still under debate. This paper used ab initio method to investigate this kind of influence of Mg2+, Fe2+ and Zn2+ cations on 13C-18O bonds in precipitated aragonite, calcite and dolomite. The polynomials of Δ47 and reduced partition function ratios (RPFRs) for 13/12C, 14/12C and 18/16O of these minerals were given within temperatures ranging from 260 to 1500 K. We found that these cations significantly decreased the Δ47 values at the level of 10-3 - 10-2 per mil, comparing with pure crystals; and that if the Δ47 values were used to reconstruct the temperatures Ts, the deviation of T was about 7.2°C for, for instance, zinc-enriched aragonite, as discussed in our paper. It was suggested that due to such influence, researchers would better use a proper thermometer according to the main impurity metal cations in carbonates. We also found that according to the probability theory, the theoretical value of the influence of phosphoric acid on Δ47 of CO2 degassed from different carbonates was zero.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4236/ojg.2015.55023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Yuan (2015) found decreasing, although larger, trends for Δ63 when he examined the effect on Δ63, β18O, β13C, and β14C of cations upon the surface of precipitating calcite, aragonite, and dolomite, using more simple models at a lower level of theory.

    “Yuan (2015) also found decreasing, although larger, trends for Δ 63 when he examined the effect on Δ 63 , β 18 O, β 13 C, and β 14 C of cations (Zn 2+ , Fe 2+ , and Mg 2+ ) upon the surface of precipitating calcite, aragonite, and dolomite, using more simple models at a lower level of theory.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 5

Authors
Yuan, J.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Yuan, Jie
Venue
Open Journal of Geology
Published
2015
Volume
05
Issue
05
Pages
254-267
ISSN
  • 2161-7570 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-7589
OpenAlex
W2010183536
Cited by
5
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Open Journal of Geology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (41020134003, 90914010)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
carbonate minerals, aragonite, calcite, dolomite, metal cations, magnesium, iron, zinc, oxygen isotopes, carbon isotopes, Δ47, reduced partition function ratio, temperature reconstruction, phosphoric acid, CO2 degassing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review