CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 33Innovations in Medical EducationNursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Building on the evidence: Interventions promoting NCLEX success

Open access
Hyland, Judy R.·2012·Open Journal of Nursing
DOI 10.4236/ojn.2012.23036
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Nurse educators have implemented a variety of teaching/learning interventions in an effort to maintain or improve student success and NCLEX pass rates. An integrative review of literature from 2004 through 2010 was conducted to investigate the specific strategies used and their outcome effectiveness. Five major databases were queried using the search terms of test taking, preparation, remediation, success, review course, HESI, Pearson, Kaplan, ATI, Hurst and NCLEX. Of the resultant 40 articles, 14 met the inclusion criteria and provided measurable outcomes. All studies implemented multiple strategies at a single institution; 7 included standardized testing and 7 used review courses as one of the multiple intervenetions. When standardized testing was a strategy included with individual and curricular changes, NCLEX passage improvement was found for 6 schools. Review courses coupled with individual and cohort interventions improved success in 5 of 7 schools. This review discusses commonalities and differences of a combination of teaching/learning interventions that improved NCLEX success.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4236/ojn.2012.23036

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Search results and categories of articles.
Figure 1 Search results and categories of articles.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Smith, S.P. (2005) HESI exams: Evidence-based research for predicting NCLEX success and benchmarking student progress. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 23, S8. · DOI
  2. Tipton, P., Pulliam, M., Beckworth, C., Illich, P., Griffin, R. and Tibbitt, A. (2008) Predictors of associate degree nursing students’ success students. Southern Online Journal of Nursing Research, 8, 8. · DOI
  3. Norton, C.K., Relf, M.V., Cox, C.W., Farley, J., Lachat, M., Tucker, M. and Murray, J. (2006) Ensuring NCLEXRN success for first-time test-takers. Journal of Professional Nursing, 22, 322-326. · DOI
  4. Rebeschi, L. and Aronson, B. (2009) Assessment of nursing students learning outcomes and employment choice after the implementation of a senior capstone course. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 6, 1-5. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 33

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hyland, J. R.
Corresponding author
Hyland, Judy R.
Venue
Open Journal of Nursing
Publisher
Scientific Research Publishing, Inc.
Published
2012
Volume
02
Issue
03
Pages
231-238
ISSN
  • 2162-5336 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-5344
DOI
10.4236/ojn.2012.23036
OpenAlex
W2055764249
Cited by
22
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Open Journal of Nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
NCLEX pass rates, nursing students, nursing education, review course, standardized testing, remediation, nursing licensure examination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review