CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fluoride Uptake and Net Primary Productivity of Selected Crops

Mishra, P. C., Sahu, S. K., Bhoi, A. K., Mohapatra, S. C.·2014·Open Journal of Soil Science
DOI 10.4236/ojss.2014.411039
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4236/ojss.2014.411039

Cites

Statistics

Figures

(1: Brinjal; 2: Tomato; 3: Mustard; 4: Mung; 5: Ladies finger; 6: Maize; 7: Paddy; 8: Chilli.)
(1: Brinjal; 2: Tomato; 3: Mustard; 4: Mung; 5: Ladies finger; 6: Maize; 7: Paddy; 8: Chilli.)CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 5
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 6
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 7
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 8
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 9
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 10
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 11
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 12
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 13
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 14
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 15
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 16
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 17
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Greenwood, Norman, N. and Earnshaw, A. (1997) Chemistry of the Elements. 2nd Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1340 p.
  2. Edmunds, W.M. and Smedley, P.L. (1996) Groundwater Geochemistry and Health: An Overview. In: Appleton, Fuge and McCall, Eds., Environmental Geochemistry and Health, Vol. 113, Geological Society Special Publication, London, 91-105. · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0003-9969(86)90041-5 · DOI
  4. Haikel, Y. (1989) The Effects of Airborne Fluorides on Oral Conditions in Morocco. Journal of Dental Research, 68, 1238-1241. · DOI
  5. WHO (1996) Volume 2: Health Criteria and Other Supporting Information. In: Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, 2nd Edition, World Health Organization, Geneva.
  6. Davison, A. (1983) Uptake, Transport and Accumulation of Soil and Airborne Fluorides by Vegetation. In: Shupe, J., Peterson, H. and Leone, N., Eds., Fluorides: Effects on Vegetation, Animals and Humans, Paragon Press, Salt Lake City, 61-82.
  7. Polomski, J., Fluhler, H. and Blaser, P. (1982) Accumulation of Airborne Fluoride in Soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 11, 457-461. · DOI
  8. Hemens, J. and Warwick, R.J. (1972) The Effects of Fluoride on Estuarine Organisms. Water Research, 6, 1301-1308. · DOI
  9. Michel, J., Suttie, J. and Sunde, M. (1984) Fluorine Deposition in Bone as Related to Physiological State. Poultry Science, 63, 1407-1411. · DOI
  10. Kierdorf, H. and Kierdorf, U. (1997) Disturbances of the Secretory Stage of Amelogenesis in Fluorosed Deer Teeth: A Scanning Electron-Microscopic Study. Cell and Tissue Research, 289, 125-135. · DOI
  11. Sands, M., Nicol, S. and McMinn, A. (1998) Fluoride in Antarctic Marine Crustaceans. Marine Biology, 132, 591-598. · DOI
  12. Rath, S.P., Sarangi, P.K. and Mishra, P.C. (1998) Bioaccumulation and Bioconcentration of Fluoride in Environmental Segments of Hirakud, India. Indian Journal of Environmental Protection, 18, 199-202.
  13. Mishra, P.C., Pradhan, K., Meher, K. and Bhosagar, D. (2009) Fluoride in the Environmental Segments at Hirakud of Western Orissa, India. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 3, 260-264.
  14. Mishra, P.C. and Mohapatra, A.K. (1998) Haematological Characteristics and Bone Fluoride Content in Bufo melanostictus from an Aluminium Industrial Site. Environmental Pollution, 99, 421-423. · DOI
  15. Odum, E.P. (1960) Organic Production and Turnover in Old Field Succession. Ecology, 41, 34-49. · DOI
  16. Stevens, D.P., McLaughlin, M.J. and Alston, A.M. (1997) Phytotoxicity of Aluminium-Fluoride Complexes Culture by Avena sativa and Lycopersicon esclentum. Plant and Soil, 192, 81-93. · DOI
  17. Stevens, D.P., McLaughlin, M.J. and Alston, A.M. (1998) Phytotoxicity of Hydrogen Fluoride and Fluoroborate and Their Uptake from Solution Culture by Lycopersicon esculentum and Avena sativa. Plant and Soil, 200, 175-184. · DOI
  18. 10.1007/BF00696829 · DOI
  19. Hocking, M.B., Hocking, D. and Smyth, T.A. (1980) Fluoride Distribution and Dispersion Processes about an Industrial Point Source in a Forested Coastal Zone. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 14, 133-157. · DOI
  20. Black, C.A. (1968) Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium. In: Soil Plant Relationships, 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 405-773.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mishra, P. C., Sahu, S. K., Bhoi, A. K., & Mohapatra, S. C.
Venue
Open Journal of Soil Science
Publisher
Scientific Research Publishing, Inc.
Published
2014
Volume
04
Issue
11
Pages
388-398
ISSN
  • 2162-5360
  • 2162-5379
DOI
10.4236/ojss.2014.411039
Cited by
9
References
0
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review