The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep belief networks
Open accessAbstract
Recently, Hinton et al.[6] derived a way to perform fast, greedy learning of deep belief networks (DBN) one layer at a time, with the top two layers forming an undirected bipartite graph (associate memory). The learning procedure consists of training a stack of Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBM’s) each having only one layer of latent (hidden) feature detectors. The learned feature activations of one RBM are used as the “data” for training the next RBM in the stack. The important aspect of this layer-wise training procedure is that, provided the number of features per layer does not decrease, [6] showed that each extra layer increases a variational lower bound on the log probability of data. So layer-by-layer training can be repeated several times 1 to learn a deep, hierarchical model in which each layer of features captures strong high-order correlations between the activities of features in the layer below. We will discuss three ideas based on greedily learning a hierarchy of features: Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction. The DBN framework allows us to make nonlinear autoencoders work considerably better [7] than widely used methods such as PCA, SVD, and LLE. The standard way to train autoencoders is to use backpropagation to reduce the reconstruction error. It is difficult, however, to optimize the weights in non-linear autoencoders that have multiple hidden layers with many million parameters [3, 5]. We use our greedy learning algorithm to pretrain autoencoders. This pretraining stage discovers useful features efficiently. After the pretraining stage, the model is “unfolded” to produce encoder and decoder networks that initially use the same weights. The global fine-tuning stage then uses backpropagation through the whole autoencoder to fine-tune the weights for optimal reconstruction. The key idea is that the greedy learning algorithm
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
Self-citation
Cited by
Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Cybersecurity
Xin, Y., Kong, L., Liu, Z., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Zhu, H., Gao, M., Hou, H., & Wang, C. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2836950 · Cited by 1,228
Sarker, I. H. (2022) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-022-01043-x · Cited by 1,208
Deep learning modelling techniques: Current progress, applications, advantages, and challenges
Ahmed, S. F., Alam, M. S. B., Hassan, M., Rozbu, M. R., Ishtiak, T., Rafa, N., Mofijur, M., Shawkat Ali, A. B. M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10466-8 · Cited by 1,079
A survey on deep learning based bearing fault diagnosis
Hoang, D.-T., & Kang, H.-J. (2019) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.06.078 · Cited by 866
Feature dimensionality reduction: a review
Jia, W., Sun, M., Lian, J., & Hou, S. (2022) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-021-00637-x · Cited by 797
Metadata
- Authors
- Hinton, G.
- Venue
- Scholarpedia
- Publisher
- Scholarpedia
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 5947
- ISSN
- 1941-6016 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973445088
- Cited by
- 885
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep belief networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4249/scholarpedia.5947
- The paper
- Hinton, G. (2009). Deep belief networks. Scholarpedia. https://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.5947
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.