Cited by 40Climate Change and Health ImpactsPublic Health and Environmental IssuesViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology

Diarrhea Patterns and Climate: A Spatiotemporal Bayesian Hierarchical Analysis of Diarrheal Disease in Afghanistan

Open access
Anwar, Mohammad Y., Warren, Joshua L., Pitzer, Virginia E.·2019·The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Abstract

Subject to a high burden of diarrheal diseases, Afghanistan is also susceptible to climate change. This study investigated the spatiotemporal distribution of diarrheal disease in the country and how associated it is with climate variables. Using monthly aggregated new cases of acute diarrhea reported between 2010 and 2016 and monthly averaged climate data at the district level, we fitted a hierarchical Bayesian spatiotemporal statistical model. We found aridity and mean daily temperature were positively associated with diarrhea incidence; every 1°C increase in mean daily temperature and 0.01-unit change in the aridity index were associated with a 0.70% (CI: 0.67%, 0.73%) increase and a 4.79% (CI: 4.30%, 5.26%) increase in the risk of diarrhea, respectively. Average annual temperature, on the other hand, was negatively associated, with a 3.7% (CI: 3.74%, 3.68) decrease in risk for every degree Celsius increase in annual average temperature. Temporally, most districts exhibited similar seasonal trends, with incidence peaking in summer, except for the eastern region where differences in climate patterns and population density may be associated with high rates of diarrhea throughout the year. The results from this study highlight the significant role of climate in shaping diarrheal patterns in Afghanistan, allowing policymakers to account for potential impacts of climate change in their public health assessments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0735

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 40

Authors
Anwar, M. Y., Warren, J. L., & Pitzer, V. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
2019-09-04
Volume
101
Issue
3
Pages
525-533
ISSN
  • 0002-9637 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-1645
OpenAlex
W2965712510
Cited by
40
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863, KL2TR001862)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI112970)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Public Health and Environmental Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Keywords
acute diarrhea, climate change, aridity index, daily mean temperature, seasonal variation, spatiotemporal variation, Afghanistan, public health policy
MeSH terms
Afghanistan, Bayes Theorem, Diarrhea, Humans, Public Health, Risk Factors, Seasons, Temperature, Models, Statistical, Incidence, Climate Change, Spatio-Temporal Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review