Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dengue and Chikungunya Virus Infection in Man in Thailand, 1962–1964: IV. Epidemiologic Studies in the Bangkok Metropolitan Area

Halstead, Scott B., Scanlon, John E., Umpaivit, Prabhasri, Udomsakdi, Suchinda·1969·The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Abstract

An attempt at a comprehensive measurement of illness documented by physicians and infection in man caused by dengue and chikungunya viruses was made in Bangkok and Thonburi during all or portions of 1962–1964. Inpatient data were collected directly from all metropolitan hospitals. Outpatients were studied only at Children's Hospital. In 1962, a seroepidemiologic study of arbovirus infection was made in 7,093 Bangkok households in 19 separate areas, from five of which mosquitoes were collected for enumeration and attempts to isolate virus. During the study, 10,194 patients with hemorrhagic fever were admitted to Bangkok hospitals, and 559 died. At least 80% of these cases were caused by dengue virus. In 1962 alone, it was estimated that between 181,000 and 287,000 dengue illnesses and 44,000 to 70,000 chikungunya illnesses were seen by physicians in outpatient children. Agespecific hospitalization rates peaked at less than 1 year and again at 3 or 4 years, few cases occurring after the age of 15. Hospitalizations were rare in infants during the first 3 months of life; rates then rose abruptly, peaking at 8 months then declining markedly. Hospitalization rates for girls over the age of 1 were consistently higher than for boys. Dengue- and chikungunya-infection rates measured in 1,887 persons bled before and after the rainy season in 1962 were 41% and 31%, respectively. Hospitalization rates varied directly with dengue-virus infection rates but not with income or ethnic group. Hospitalizations occurred within families at almost four times the expected rate. Disease progressed throughout the city and within study areas in a "brush-fire" manner. In contrast to the observations of others, we isolated dengue and chikungunya virus almost exclusively from Aedes aegypti. Although Culex tritaeniorhynchus and Culex gelidus were numerous in light-trap collections, they were rarely attracted to man. These observations suggest a low level of anthropophilia in these species in Thailand and the possibility of a biological barrier to transmission of arboviruses by them to man.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4269/ajtmh.1969.18.997

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Halstead, S. B., Scanlon, J. E., Umpaivit, P., & Udomsakdi, S.
Venue
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
1969-11
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
997-1021
ISSN
0002-9637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2607233850
Cited by
303
References
0
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dengue and Chikungunya Virus Infection in Man in Thailand, 1962–1964: IV. Epidemiologic Studies in the Bangkok Metropolitan Area. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4269/ajtmh.1969.18.997
The paper
Halstead, S. B., Scanlon, J. E., Umpaivit, P., & Udomsakdi, S. (1969). Dengue and Chikungunya Virus Infection in Man in Thailand, 1962–1964: IV. Epidemiologic Studies in the Bangkok Metropolitan Area. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1969.18.997

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.