Cited by 98Viral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchViral Infections and VectorsVirology and Viral Diseases

Epidemiologic investigation of Marburg virus disease, Southern Africa, 1975

Conrad, J. Lyle, Isaacson, Margaretha, Smith, Eric Burnett, Wulff, Herta, Crees, Mike, Geldenhuys, Piet, Johnston, James·1978·The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Abstract

During the first 10 days of February 1975, an Australian hitchhiker contracted Marburg virus disease while traveling through Rhodesia and died; the infection was subsequently passed to two other persons, who recovered. Investigators retraced the hitchhiker's steps in March and again in June 1975 in an effort to uncover the natural reservoir of the virus and determine how it was transmitted. Serum samples were collected from humans and animals wherever the patient had come in close contact with animals or insects. Arthropods of various types were collected in June 1975 and again in February 1976 for virus isolation attempts; at no time did the patient come in direct contact with nonhuman primates of any kind, or any other animals. Indirect contact with bats, monkeys, and birds through aerosols was possible, though at some distance. Direct contact with arthropods occurred throughout the trip; on several occasions it was notably severe. We believe that during this outbreak the first Marburg virus infection occurred by vector-borne transmission from an arthropod yet to be identified, and that patients 2 and 3 acquired the disease by exposure to the oropharyngeal secretions of patients 1 and 2, respectively. Studies are underway to identify the species of arthropod involved in this transmission.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4269/ajtmh.1978.27.1210

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conrad, J. L., Isaacson, M., Smith, E. B., Wulff, H., Crees, M., Geldenhuys, P., & Johnston, J.
Venue
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
1978-11
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
1210-1215
ISSN
0002-9637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W28508157
Cited by
98
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Vectors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
Marburg virus disease, vector-borne transmission, arthropod vectors, natural reservoirs, outbreak investigation, travel-associated infection, Rhodesia, non-human primates, bats, airborne transmission, oropharyngeal secretions
MeSH terms
Adult, Africa, Southern, Animals, Arthropod Vectors, Disease Reservoirs, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, Marburg Virus Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review