Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Oropouche Virus: I. A Review of Clinical, Epidemiological, and Ecological Findings

Pinheiro, Francisco P., Travassos da Rosa, Amelia P. A., Travassos da Rosa, Jorge F. S., Ishak, Ricardo, Freitas, Ronaldo B., Gomes, Maria L. C., LeDuc, James W., Oliva, Otavio F. P.·1981·The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Abstract

Between 1961 and 1978 seven outbreaks of Oropouche (ORO) virus have been documented in Pará State, Brazil. The clinical picture of ORO infection is characterized by fever, chills, headache, muscle pain, arthralgia, and other minor clinical manifestations. No deaths have to date been attributed to the disease but a proportion of patients become severely ill, occasionally to the point of prostration. Recurrence of symptoms has been observed in some patients, especially within the first 10 days after the initial symptoms. In some patients asthenia was noted for a period of 2–4 weeks. Outbreaks of ORO virus occurred in both small and large urban centers. In the largest urban centers the virus was limited to certain districts, whereas in villages the agent was spread throughout. Dissemination of ORO virus to several localities was observed in the 1967 Bragança and in the 1975 Santarém outbreaks. Over 30,000 persons became infected during these epidemics. All age groups were affected and the female:male attack rate varied from 1:1 to 3:1 in the different localities. Culicoides paraensis and Culex quinquefasciatus were the most common anthropophilic hematophagous arthropods in the epidemic areas. Virological and epidemiological evidence points to C. paraensis as the main urban vector of ORO virus. Successful experimental transmissions by the bite of C. paraensis further support the role of this midge as a vector. About 10% of patients infected with ORO virus develop viremia levels capable of infecting C. paraensis. It is conceivable that the urban cycle of ORO virus involves a man-to-man cycle maintained by C. paraensis. Since the maximum duration of the urban cycle is apparently only 6 months it seems likely that the virus is perpetuated by a sylvatic cycle. It is possible that certain species of primates, sloths, and wild birds can act as vertebrate hosts for the virus. Little is known, however, about the forest vector of ORO virus.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4269/ajtmh.1981.30.149

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Pinheiro, F. P., Travassos da Rosa, A. P. A., Travassos da Rosa, J. F. S., Ishak, R., Freitas, R. B., Gomes, M. L. C., LeDuc, J. W., & Oliva, O. F. P.
Venue
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
1981-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
149-160
ISSN
0002-9637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W15675854
Cited by
181
References
0
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oropouche Virus: I. A Review of Clinical, Epidemiological, and Ecological Findings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4269/ajtmh.1981.30.149
The paper
Pinheiro, F. P., Travassos da Rosa, A. P. A., Travassos da Rosa, J. F. S., Ishak, R., Freitas, R. B., Gomes, M. L. C., LeDuc, J. W., & Oliva, O. F. P. (1981). Oropouche Virus: I. A Review of Clinical, Epidemiological, and Ecological Findings. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1981.30.149

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.