Insecticide resistance issues in vector-borne disease control
Abstract
Vector-borne diseases are an increasing cause of death and suffering worldwide. Efforts to control these diseases have been focused on the use of chemical pesticides, but arthropod resistance (whether physiological, biochemical, or behavioral) to pesticides is now an immense practical problem. The pharmacokinetic interactions of pesticides with arthropods, mechanisms of resistance, and the strengths and shortcomings of different resistance test methods are briefly reviewed. Using malaria control as an example, the differences between the efficacy of insecticide-sprayed houses in reducing malaria transmission, and the actual effect of such treatments on vectors are discussed. Reduced malaria transmission as a result of spraying house walls occurs through some combination of killing vectors that land on sprayed walls (insecticidal effect) and by preventing vectors from entering or remaining inside long enough to bite (behavioral effects). Both insecticidal and behavioral effects of insecticides are important, but the relative importance of one versus the other is controversial. Field studies in Africa, India, Brazil, and Mexico provide persuasive evidence for strong behavioral avoidance of DDT by the primary vector species. This avoidance behavior, exhibited when malaria vectors avoid insecticides by not entering or by rapidly exiting sprayed houses, should raise serious questions about the overall value of current physiological and biochemical resistance tests. The continued efficacy of DDT in Africa, India, Brazil, and Mexico, where 69% of all reported cases of malaria occur and where vectors are physiologically resistant to DDT (excluding Brazil), serves as one indicator that repellency is very important in preventing indoor transmission of malaria. This experience with DDT has implications for future control efforts because pyrethroids also stimulate avoidance behaviors in arthropods. Each chemical should be studied early (before broad-scale use) to define types of action against vector species by geographic area, especially for impregnated bed net applications. The problems for vector control created by use of insecticides in agriculture and the potential for management of resistance in both agriculture and vector-borne disease control are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The repellent and irritant properties of DDT have the potential to reduce transmission of disease and relieve the selective pressure for toxic resistance.
“However, the repellent and irritant properties of DDT also have the potential to reduce transmission of disease and relieve the selective pressure for toxic resistance (Grieco et al. 2007; Roberts and Andre 1994).”
From Global Status of DDT and Its Alternatives for Use in Vector Control to Prevent Disease (2009) · cites this paper as Roberts and Andre 1994
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Global Status of DDT and Its Alternatives for Use in Vector Control to Prevent Disease
van den Berg, H. (2009) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.0900785 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Genetic erosion impedes adaptive responses to stressful environments
Bijlsma, R., & Loeschcke, V. (2012) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00214.x · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Review of insecticide resistance and behavioral avoidance of vectors of human diseases in Thailand
Chareonviriyaphap, T., Bangs, M. J., Suwonkerd, W., Kongmee, M., Corbel, V., & Ngoen-Klan, R. (2013) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/1756-3305-6-280 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Killeen, G. F., & Smith, T. A. (2007) · Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.04.022 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Mathias, D. K., Ochomo, E., Atieli, F., Ombok, M., Nabie Bayoh, M., Olang, G., Muhia, D., Kamau, L., Vulule, J. M., Hamel, M. J., et al. (2011) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2875-10-10 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
DDT house spraying and re-emerging malaria
Roberts, D., Manguin, S., & Mouchet, J. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02516-2 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationKongmee, M., Prabaripai, A., Akratanakul, P., Bangs, M. J., & Chareonviriyaphap, T. (2004) · Journal of Medical Entomology · doi:10.1603/0022-2585-41.6.1055 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Davari, B., Vatandoost, H., Oshaghi, M. A., Ladonni, H., Enayati, A. A., Shaeghi, M., Basseri, H. R., Rassi, Y., & Hanafi-Bojd, A. A. (2007) · Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.pestbp.2007.04.003 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Spatio-temporal patterns of malaria infection in Bhutan: a country embarking on malaria elimination
Wangdi, K., Kaewkungwal, J., Singhasivanon, P., Silawan, T., Lawpoolsri, S., & White, N. J. (2011) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2875-10-89 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Roberts, D. R., & Andre, R. G.
- Affiliations
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
- Venue
- The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6_Suppl
- Pages
- 21-34
- ISSN
- 0002-9637 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1901149525
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Dengue and Mosquito Control Research
- Keywords
- insecticide resistance, vector-borne diseases, malaria control, DDT, behavioral avoidance, repellent activity, indoor residual spraying, pyrethroid insecticides, insecticide resistance mechanisms, resistance testing, insecticide efficacy, Anopheles vectors
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anopheles, Arthropod Vectors, Bedding and Linens, Communicable Disease Control, DDT, Humans, Insecticide Resistance, Malaria, Mosquito Control, Agrochemicals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review